首页> 外文期刊>Bioethics >The epistemic and ethical onus of 'One Health'
【24h】

The epistemic and ethical onus of 'One Health'

机译:“一个健康”的认识和道德淫秽

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper argues that the practical reach and ethical impact of the One Health paradigm is conditional on satisfactorily distinguishing between interconnected and interdependent factors among human, non-human, and environmental health. Interconnection does not entail interdependence. Offering examples of interconnections and interdependence in the context of existing One Health literature, we demonstrate that the conversations about One Health do not yet sufficiently differentiate between those concepts. They tend to either ignore such distinctions or embrace bioethically untenable positions. We conclude that careful conceptual differentiation can prevent One Health stakeholders either from over-reaching or under-reaching the practical and ethical boundaries of this developing paradigm.
机译:本文认为,一个健康范式的实际覆盖范围和道德影响是令人满意地区分人类,非人类和环境健康之间的相互联系和相互依存因素的条件。 互连不需要相互依赖。 在现有的一个健康文献的背景下提供互联和相互依存的例子,我们证明了关于一个健康的对话尚未充分区分这些概念。 它们倾向于忽略这种区别或拥抱生物思维方式无法维持的位置。 我们得出结论,仔细的概念分化可以防止一个卫生利益相关者从过度达到或不达到这种发展范式的实际和道德界限。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号