首页> 外文期刊>Acta Cardiologica >Intra-cardiac echocardiography in atrial septal interventions: impact on hospitalization costs.
【24h】

Intra-cardiac echocardiography in atrial septal interventions: impact on hospitalization costs.

机译:心房间隔干预中的心脏内超声心动图检查:对住院费用的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Intra-cardiac echocardiography (ICE) is used to guide percutaneous interventions on the atrial septum. However, ICE catheters are expensive. We questioned the impact of the use of ICE catheters on hospitalization costs for patent foramen ovale (PFO) or atrial septal defect (ASD) closure. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients, scheduled for atrial septal closure, were randomly selected to use the AcuNav catheter (Biosense Webster Inc, Diamond Bar, CA, US) on top of the standard procedure (three or two days of hospitalization, procedure with transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and general anaesthesia). The AcuNav catheter was provided for free and the total hospitalization cost for each patient was calculated by verification of the bills, sent to the patient and the national health insurance. This was compared with a fictive hospitalization cost when ICE alone would have been used (three or two days of hospitalization, procedure without TEE, and local anaesthesia). Feasibility and safety were also evaluated. Three PFOs and two ASDs were successfully closed (3F/2M, age 55 +/- 12 years). The total hospitalization cost for a standard closing procedure was EUR 9345 +/- 132 and EUR 9303 +/- 132 for three and two days of hospitalization, respectively. With a free ICE catheter and no general anaesthesia, hospitalization cost lowered to EUR 8464 +/- 131 and EUR 8422 +/-131, respectively. Cost saving would be EUR 881 +/- 3, but the price of a single-use ICE catheter varies between EUR 2000 and 2500. In all patients, adequate images were obtained and no complications related to the ICE catheter occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Single-use ICE catheters remain expensive in percutaneous ASD or PFO closure. However, general anaesthesia might be avoided, which could open a discussion on cost savings.
机译:目的:心脏内超声心动图(ICE)用于指导对房间隔的经皮介入治疗。然而,ICE导管是昂贵的。我们质疑使用ICE导管对卵圆孔未闭(PFO)或房间隔缺损(ASD)封闭的住院费用的影响。方法和结果:按标准程序(住院三天或两天,经食道超声心动图检查的程序)随机选择计划进行房间隔封闭的患者使用AcuNav导管(Biosense Webster Inc,Diamond Bar,CA,美国) (TEE)和全身麻醉)。 AcuNav导管是免费提供的,每位患者的总住院费用通过核对账单,发送给患者和国民健康保险来计算。将其与仅使用ICE时的假想住院费用(住院三到两天,无TEE的手术以及局部麻醉)进行了比较。还评估了可行性和安全性。成功关闭了三个PFO和两个ASD(3F / 2M,年龄55 +/- 12岁)。标准关闭程序的三天和两天住院总住院费用分别为9345欧元+/- 132欧元和9303欧元+/- 132欧元。使用免费的ICE导管且无需全身麻醉,住院费用分别降低至8464 +/- 131欧元和8422 +/- 131欧元。节省的成本为881 +/- 3欧元,但一次性ICE导管的价格在2000欧元至2500欧元之间。在所有患者中,均获得了足够的图像,并且没有发生与ICE导管相关的并发症。结论:一次性ICE导管在经皮ASD或PFO封闭中仍然很昂贵。但是,可以避免全身麻醉,这可能会引发有关节省成本的讨论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号