...
首页> 外文期刊>Academic radiology >Toward consistent use of reporting scales in imaging studies.
【24h】

Toward consistent use of reporting scales in imaging studies.

机译:争取在影像学研究中始终使用报告量表。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This editorial refers to the article "Potential effect of different radiologist reporting methods on studies showing benefit of CAD" by Horsch et al in the present issue of Academic Radiology (1).There are several communities or "cultures" that will find common ground in this article. One community includes the public and private funding sponsors and developers of new technologies for medical imaging-in particular, the technology of computer algorithms that assist radiologists in their decision making. Another community therefore is that of the radiologists themselves who will use these technologies. Then there is the community developing study designs and statistical assessment methodologies for evaluating the new technologies. Downstream we encounter the community of public policy makers who approve and clear these technologies for entrance to the marketplace for their specified task and the third-party payers who determine when a combination of a technology and a diagnostic task meet their criteria for reimbursement.
机译:这篇社论引用的是Horsch等人在本期《学术放射学》(1)中发表的文章“不同的放射线医生报告方法对显示CAD益处的研究的潜在影响”。有几种社区或“文化”可以在本文。一个社区包括公共和私人资金的赞助商以及医学成像新技术的开发人员,特别是可以帮助放射科医生做出决策的计算机算法技术。因此,另一个社区就是将使用这些技术的放射科医生本身。然后是社区开发用于评估新技术的研究设计和统计评估方法。在下游,我们遇到了公共决策者社区,他们批准并清除了这些技术以进入其指定任务的市场,而第三方付款人则确定了一项技术和诊断任务的组合何时满足其报销标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号