首页> 外文期刊>Academic radiology >Comparison of chest dual-energy subtraction digital tomosynthesis and dual-energy subtraction radiography for detection of pulmonary nodules. Initial evaluations in human clinical cases.
【24h】

Comparison of chest dual-energy subtraction digital tomosynthesis and dual-energy subtraction radiography for detection of pulmonary nodules. Initial evaluations in human clinical cases.

机译:胸部双能减影数字断层合成与双能减影X线摄影在检测肺结节方面的比较。对人类临床病例的初步评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Rationale and Objectives: To compare initial evaluations of chest dual-energy subtraction digital tomosynthesis (DES-DT) and dual-energy subtraction radiography (DES-R) for detection of pulmonary nodules. Materials and Methods: DES-DT and DES-R systems with pulsed x-rays and rapid kV switching were used to evaluate pulmonary nodules (>4-6mm, 2 nodules; >6-8mm, 2 nodules; >8mm, 32 nodules). Multidetector computed tomography was used as a reference. A filtered back-projection algorithm was used to reconstruct low-voltage (60 kVp), high-voltage (120 kVp), and soft-tissue or bone-subtracted tomograms of the desired layer thicknesses from the image data acquired during a single tomographic scan. DES-R images were processed from the low- and high-voltage images. To detect the pulmonary nodules, we used both systems to examine 36 patients with and 36 patients without pulmonary nodules. Two radiologists and three doctors of pulmonary medicine (average experience, 18years) performed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to evaluate the results. Results: The ROC analysis results suggested that the detection ability was significantly better for DES-DT than for DES-R ( P<.0001; 95% confidence interval: DES-DT, 0.94 [0.83-0.99]; DES-R, 0.76 [0.68-0.85]; sensitivity: DES-DT, 87.7±2.9%; DES-R, 53.8±3.5%; specificity: DES-DT, 78.3±5.6%; DES-R, 78.4±3.4%; accuracy: DES-DT, 83.1±3.8%, DES-R, 66.1±2.0%). When the nodules were no longer superimposed over the normal structures, their characteristics and distribution could be observed much more clearly. Conclusion: Compared with DES-R, DES-DT provided greater sensitivity for detection of pulmonary nodules, particularly for the larger ones.
机译:理由和目的:比较胸部双能减影数字断层合成(DES-DT)和双能减影X线照相(DES-R)对肺结节的初步评估。材料和方法:使用具有脉冲X射线和快速kV转换的DES-DT和DES-R系统评估肺结节(> 4-6mm,2个结节;> 6-8mm,2个结节;> 8mm,32个结节) 。将多探测器计算机断层扫描作为参考。过滤后的投影算法用于从单次断层扫描中获取的图像数据重建所需层厚度的低压(60 kVp),高压(120 kVp)以及软组织或骨骼减去的断层图像。 DES-R图像是根据低压和高压图像处理的。为了检测肺结节,我们使用两种系统检查了36例有肺结节的患者和36例无肺结节的患者。两名放射科医生和三名肺内科医师(平均经验,18年)进行了受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析,以评估结果。结果:ROC分析结果表明,DES-DT的检测能力明显优于DES-R(P <.0001; 95%置信区间:DES-DT,0.94 [0.83-0.99]; DES-R,0.76 [0.68-0.85];灵敏度:DES-DT,87.7±2.9%; DES-R,53.8±3.5%;特异性:DES-DT,78.3±5.6%; DES-R,78.4±3.4%;准确性:DES- DT,83.1±3.8%,DES-R,66.1±2.0%。当结节不再重叠在正常结构上时,可以更清楚地观察到它们的特征和分布。结论:与DES-R相比,DES-DT对肺结节,尤其是较大结节的检测灵敏度更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号