...
首页> 外文期刊>Biosystems Engineering >Comparison between grain-size analyses using laser diffraction and sedimentation methods
【24h】

Comparison between grain-size analyses using laser diffraction and sedimentation methods

机译:激光衍射和沉积法粒度分析的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

A comparison between laser diffraction method (LDM) and the sieve-hydrometer method (SHM) was carried out for 228 soil samples representing a different texture classification sampled in a Sicilian basin. The analysis demonstrated that the sand content measured by SHM can be assumed equal to that determined by LDM technique, while the clay fraction measured by LDM was lower than that measured by the SHM. A set of equations to transform LDM results to SHM results was proposed. The influence of the LDM measurements of clay on the estimated percentage of silt + very fine sand particles (particle diameter ranging from 0.002 mm to 0.1 mm), which is useful for estimating soil erodibility, was also studied. (C) 2010 IAgrE. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:对代表西西里盆地中不同质地分类的228个土壤样品进行了激光衍射法(LDM)和筛分比重计法(SHM)的比较。分析表明,SHM测得的砂含量可以假定与LDM技术测得的相同,而LDM测得的粘土含量低于SHM测得的。提出了一组将LDM结果转换为SHM结果的方程。还研究了粘土的LDM测量对估计的泥沙+非常细的砂粒(粒径范围为0.002 mm至0.1 mm)的百分比的影响,这对于估算土壤的可蚀性是有用的。 (C)2010年。由Elsevier Ltd.出版。保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号