...
首页> 外文期刊>Accreditation and quality assurance >Validation of analytical methods used for determination of nitrate in soil
【24h】

Validation of analytical methods used for determination of nitrate in soil

机译:用于测定土壤中硝酸盐的分析方法的验证

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The standard method (ISO/ DIS 14255) and the quick test were used for determination of nitrate in soil. We validated both methods using parameters such as accuracy, reproducibility within 1 day and between days, limit of detection and limit of quantification. The accuracy of the results was determined using the analysis of samples from the international interlaboratory scheme WEPAL. The accuracy of the standard method was good, while for the quick test the results were not accurate. The standard method showed a solid reproducibility of measurement results ( in 1 day, relative standard deviation, RSD= 0.2%; between days, RSD= 0.8%). The quick test gave poorer results ( in 1 day, RSD= 6%; between days, RSD= 7%). We tried to established the compatibility of both methods on real soil samples and we were satisfied to obtain the correlation coefficient 0.98 using the regression straight line. The analyses with the quick field instrument are much simpler and cheaper than the standard laboratory analyses and can be used for advising on nitrogen fertilisation.
机译:标准方法(ISO / DIS 14255)和快速测试用于测定土壤中的硝酸盐。我们使用诸如准确性,1天之内和几天之间的可重复性,检测限和定量限之类的参数验证了这两种方法。使用国际实验室间计划WEPAL的样品分析来确定结果的准确性。标准方法的准确性很好,而用于快速测试的结果并不准确。标准方法显示了测量结果的可重复性(1天,相对标准偏差,RSD = 0.2%;两天之间,RSD = 0.8%)。快速测试给出的结果较差(在1天中,RSD = 6%;在几天之间,RSD = 7%)。我们试图建立两种方法在真实土壤样品上的相容性,并通过回归直线获得相关系数0.98。与标准实验室分析相比,使用快速现场仪器进行的分析要简单得多且便宜得多,可用于建议氮肥施用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号