首页> 外文期刊>Biosemiotics >Organic Semiosis and Peircean Semiosis
【24h】

Organic Semiosis and Peircean Semiosis

机译:有机符号学和Peelcean符号学

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The discovery of the genetic code has shown that the origin of life has also been the origin of semiosis, and the discovery of many other organic codes has indicated that organic semiosis has been the sole form of semiosis present on Earth in the first three thousand million years of evolution. With the origin of animals and the evolution of the brain, however, a new type of semiosis came into existence, a semiosis that is based on interpretation and is commonly referred to as interpretive, or Peircean semiosis. This suggests that there are two distinct types of semiosis in Nature, one based on coding and one based on interpretation, and all the experimental evidence that we have does support this conclusion. Both in principle and in practice, therefore, there is no conflict between organic semiosis and Peircean semiosis, and yet they have been the object of a fierce controversy because it has been claimed that semiosis is always based on interpretation, even at the cellular level. Such a claim has recently been reproposed in a number of papers and it has become necessary therefore to reexamine it in the light of the proposed arguments.
机译:遗传密码的发现表明生命的起源也是符号学的起源,许多其他有机密码的发现表明,有机符号学已成为地球上前三亿年中存在的唯一符号学形式。多年的发展。然而,随着动物的起源和大脑的进化,出现了一种新型的符号学,一种基于解释的符号学,通常被称为解释性或皮尔士符号学。这表明自然界中存在两种不同类型的符号学,一种基于编码,另一种基于解释,我们拥有的所有实验证据均支持该结论。因此,无论是在原理上还是在实践上,有机符号学和皮尔士符号学之间都没有冲突,但是它们一直是激烈争论的对象,因为有人宣称符号学总是基于解释,即使在细胞水平上也是如此。最近在许多论文中都提出了这种主张,因此有必要根据提出的论点重新审查它。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号