...
首页> 外文期刊>癌と化学療法 >Clinical Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Anagrelide Used with or without Hydroxycarbamide in Japanese Patients with Essential Thrombocythemia-A Retrospective Single-Center Study of 35 Cases
【24h】

Clinical Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Anagrelide Used with or without Hydroxycarbamide in Japanese Patients with Essential Thrombocythemia-A Retrospective Single-Center Study of 35 Cases

机译:临床评价anagrelide在日本基本血小板血症患者中使用或不含羟基氨基甲酰胺的疗效和安全性 - 回顾性单中心研究35例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objective: The clinical features (CF), laboratory data, disease transformation pattern and drug metabolism in essential thrombocythemia (ET) differ between Japan and Western countries. The CF of ET in clinical practice (CP) are more diverse than in prospective clinical studies. We should conduct retrospective analyses in CP. The present study was aimed at evaluating the efficacy, safety and tolerability of anagrelide (ANA) monotherapy and combined ANA plus hydroxycarbamide (HC) in Japanese ET. Patients and methods: We have a total of 35 cases. Sixteen patients received ANA monotherapy, 10 received ANA plus HC, and 9 received ANA plus other drugs. Results: Comparison among three groups revealed the absence of differences in response rate (platelet count < =60X10~4/muL, platelet count < =40X10~4/muL) (43.8%, 6.3% vs. 50.0%, 10.0% vs. 44.4%, 11.1%), treatment continuation rate (81.3% vs. 40.0% vs. 55.6%), median daily dose of ANA (1.00 mg in all three groups) or median treatment period (days) (259vs. 198.5vs. 161.0), the treatment continuation rate tended to be lower in the combined ANA plus HC. The incidence of all adverse events (AEs) was higher in the ANA monotherapy (45.7%) than ANA plus HC (28.6%) or ANA plus other drugs (25.7%), the AEs were mild in all groups. Conclusion: The tolerability of ANA monotherapy, ANA plus HC, and ANA plus other drugs were good.
机译:目的:在基本血小板上的临床特征(CF),实验室数据,疾病转化模式和药物代谢不同,日本和西方国家之间不同。在临床实践(CP)中的et et et比前瞻性临床研究更多样化。我们应该在CP中进行回顾性分析。目前的研究旨在评估anagrelide(Ana)单药治疗和组合Ana加羟基氨基甲酰胺(HC)的疗效,安全性和耐受性。患者和方法:我们共有35例。 16名患者接受ANA单药治疗,10名ANA PLUS HC,9名接受ANA加其他药物。结果:三组的比较揭示了响应速率差异(血小板计数<= 60x10〜4 / MUL,血小板计数<= 40x10〜4 / MUL)(43.8%,6.3%,50.0%,10.0%与50.0%,10.0%Vs. 44.4%,11.1%),治疗延续率(81.3%与40.0%vs.55.6%),日常剂量ANA(所有三组1.00mg)或中位治疗期(天)(259Vs。198.5Vs。161.0 ),组合ANA加HC的治疗延续率趋于较低。所有不良事件(AES)的发病率在ANA单疗法(45.7%)比ANA Plus HC(28.6%)或ANA加上其他药物(25.7%),所有群体都温和。结论:ANA单疗法,ANA PLUS HC和ANA加上其他药物的耐受性良好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号