首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry >Comparison of Solid-Phase Microextraction to Solvent Extraction and QuEChERS for Quantitative Analysis of Veterinary Drug Residues in Chicken and Beef Matrices
【24h】

Comparison of Solid-Phase Microextraction to Solvent Extraction and QuEChERS for Quantitative Analysis of Veterinary Drug Residues in Chicken and Beef Matrices

机译:保持溶剂萃取和QueChers的实相微萃取和QueChers的比较鸡和牛肉矩阵中的兽药残留量

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A fully automated high-throughput method using solid-phase microextraction (SPME) was developed and validated for quantitative analysis of more than 100 veterinary drugs in chicken and beef tissue. The work also encompassed a comparison of the SPME method to two well-documented sample preparation procedures, solvent extraction (SE) and quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, and safe (QuEChERS). SPME showed considerably less matrix effects, with only two compounds showing significant matrix effects in comparison to 30% of analytes in QuEChERS and 42% in SE in beef tissue. Excellent accuracy and precision results were achieved with all methods in the chicken matrix, with more than 91% of analytes falling within the 70-120% range of their true concentrations and relative standard deviation of <= 25% at 0.75X and 1.5X, where X is the maximum residue level. Similar results were achieved in beef tissue. All methods were able to meet regulatory limit of quantitation levels for the majority of target analytes.
机译:使用固相微萃取(SPME)的全自动高通量方法进行了开发并验证,用于鸡肉和牛肉组织中超过100名兽医药物的定量分析。工作也涵盖在SPME方法的两个证据充分的样品制备步骤,溶剂萃取(SE)和快速,简便,廉价,有效,耐用和安全(QuEChERS)的比较。 SPME表现出相当较少的基质效应,只有两种化合物,显示出显着的基质效应,与牛肉组织中的QueChers中的30%分析物中的分析物中的30%相比,并且在牛肉组织中的42%。鸡基质中的所有方法实现了优异的精度和精确的结果,超过91%的分析物落在70-120%的真实浓度范围内,相对标准偏差为0.75倍和1.5倍,其中x是最大的残留水平。在牛肉组织中实现了类似的结果。所有方法都能够满足大多数靶分析物的定量水平的监管极限。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号