Reply to Strutton et al.: Response to 'Outcomes and costs associated with PHiD-CV, a new protein D conjugate pneumococcal vaccine, in four countries'

摘要

We thank Strutton et al. for highlighting important issues for decision makers in their recent Letter to the Editor [1] and welcome the opportunity to clarify the methods we used to develop our health economic analysis for the 10-valent pneumococcal Haemophilus influenzae protein D conjugate vaccine (PHiD-CV; Synflorix). We will address our colleagues’ points regarding why we did not include the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV-13; Prevenar) as a comparator; why we used the 2+1 regimenfor some countries; and what the bases for our assumptions were regarding equal indirect effects of vaccination with PHiD-CV relative to PCV-7, PHiD-CV effectiveness against invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) and pneumonia, PHiD-CV effectiveness againstacute otitis media (AOM) and myringotomy, and the evidence for including cross-protection that Strutton et al. [1] questioned in their letter.