...
首页> 外文期刊>Transfusion: The Journal of the American Association of Blood Banks >Thawing times and hemostatic assessment of fresh frozen plasma thawed at 37°C and 45°C using water‐bath methods
【24h】

Thawing times and hemostatic assessment of fresh frozen plasma thawed at 37°C and 45°C using water‐bath methods

机译:使用水浴方法将新鲜冷冻等离子体的止血时间和止血评估在37℃和45°C下

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND The Barkey Plasmatherm (BP; Barkey GmbH & Co. KG) can thaw plasma at 37°C and 45°C. No studies have assessed thawing times or hemostatic qualities of plasma thawed at 45°C with BP. This study assessed fresh frozen plasma (FFP) thawing times with use of BP at 37°C and 45°C and Thermogenesis ThermoLine (TT; Helmer Scientific) at 37°C and compared the hemostatic quality of LG‐Octaplas (Octapharma) with use of BP at 37°C and 45°C with TT at 37°C. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS The thawing time of FFP (pairs or fours) was assessed using BP at 37°C and 45°C (not prewarmed and prewarmed) and TT at 37°C. Hemostasis was assessed in LG‐Octaplas at 5 minutes, 24?hours, 48?hours, and 120?hours after thawing with use of the three methods. RESULTS Thawing time for two units was 13.44 minutes using TT, the same as using BP at 37°C (12.94 min not prewarmed; 12.20 min prewarmed) or 45°C (12.38 min not prewarmed), but longer than using BP prewarmed to 45°C (11.31 min, p??0.001). Thawing time for four units was 13.41 minutes using TT, shorter than using BP at 37°C (17.19 min not prewarmed, 18.47 min prewarmed; both p??0.001) or 45°C (15.03 min not prewarmed, p = 0.012; 15.22 min prewarmed, p = 0.004). There was no reduction in hemostatic markers in LG‐Octaplas with use of BP at 37°C or 45°C compared to TT. CONCLUSION BP is quicker than TT by 2 minutes when thawing two units of FFP if it is prewarmed to 45°C. BP is slower than TT by at least 2 minutes when thawing four units of FFP at 37 o C. There was no significant difference in the hemostatic qualities of plasma whether thawed at 37°C or 45°C.
机译:背景技术Barkey Plasmatherm(BP; Barkey GmbH&amp; Co.KG)可以在37°C和45°C下进行血浆。没有研究在45℃下评估血浆的蒸散时间或止血品质,BP。该研究评估了在37°C和45°C和37℃的37℃和45°C和热生成的热溶岭(TT; Helmer Scientific)的新鲜冷冻等离子体(FFP)解冻时间,并将LG-Octaplas(Outapharma)的止血质量进行比较在37℃和45°C的BP,TT在37°C时。研究设计和方法使用BP在37℃和45°C(未进行预先处理和预先处理)和37°C时评估FFP(对或四种)的解冻时间。用三种方法在5分钟,24小时,48小时和120小时评估止血。结果两个单位的解冻时间是使用TT的13.44分钟,与37°C(12.94分钟不经过预先处理的12.20分钟)或45°C(未进行12.38分钟)的相同,但比使用BP预先使用BP的时间°C(11.31 min,p≤x<0.001)。使用TT的四个单位的解冻时间为13.41分钟,比在37°C(17.19分钟不追踪17.19分钟,预先使用18.47分钟;均为P 2 0.001)或45°C(15.03分钟,P = 0.012 ; 15.22分钟预先使用,p = 0.004)。与TT相比,LG-OctaPLA中的止血标记物在LG-Octaplas中没有减少,与TT相比,在37℃或45℃下使用。结论BP在第2次FFP中,BP比TT快2分钟,如果它被预先调整到45°C。在37℃下解冻四个FFP的四个单位,Bp比TT慢于TT。血浆的止血品质无论是在37°C或45°C下都没有显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号