首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition: Official Journal of the American Society for Clinical Nutrition >Opportunities and challenges in conducting systematic reviews to support the development of nutrient reference values: vitamin A as an example.
【24h】

Opportunities and challenges in conducting systematic reviews to support the development of nutrient reference values: vitamin A as an example.

机译:开展系统审查的机遇与挑战,以支持营养参考值的发展:维生素A作为一个例子。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Nutrient reference values have significant public health and policy implications. Given the importance of defining reliable nutrient reference values, there is a need for an explicit, objective, and transparent process to set these values. The Tufts Medical Center Evidence-based Practice Center assembled a group of nutrition experts from academic institutions and federal government agencies, led participants in discussions, conducted exercises in formulating questions and evidence review criteria that would be amenable to systematic reviews of the scientific literature, performed a literature search on the questions to identify potentially relevant publications, and identified challenges and limitations of applying this method to support the development of nutrient reference values using vitamin A as an example. The workgroup concluded that the systematic review approach could be productively used to inform the development of reference values. Challenges identified in this exercise include prioritizing and defining research questions when the volume of literature is large, relying on intermediate (surrogate) outcomes when few or no studies directly linking nutrient intake with clinical outcomes are available, and determining reliable nutrient biomarkers. Ultimately, an objective, unbiased systematic review of a defined question could be useful, not only in helping to set nutrient reference values, but also for increasing the transparency of the decision making process.
机译:营养参考价值具有重要的公共卫生和政策影响。鉴于定义可靠的营养参考值的重要性,需要一个明确的,目标和透明的过程来设置这些值。塔夫斯医疗中心的循证实践中心从学术机构和联邦政府机构组建了一批营养专家,LED参与者在讨论中,进行了制定问题和证据审查标准的练习,这些标准将适应科学文学的系统审查,进行关于识别潜在相关出版物的问题的文献搜索,并确定了使用维生素A作为应用该方法支持营养参考值的发展的挑战和限制。工作组的结论是,系统审查方法可以高效地推向参考价值的发展。在本练习中确定的挑战包括优先考虑和定义研究问题,当文学的体积大时,依赖于中间(替代)结果,或者在少数或没有直接与临床结果中直接连接营养摄入量的研究,并确定可靠的营养生物标志物。最终,一个目标,对定义问题的无偏见系统审查可能是有用的,而不仅仅是有助于设定营养参考值,而且还用于提高决策过程的透明度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号