...
首页> 外文期刊>Current Eye Research >Effects of lubricating agents with different osmolalities on tear osmolarity and other tear function tests in patients with dry eye
【24h】

Effects of lubricating agents with different osmolalities on tear osmolarity and other tear function tests in patients with dry eye

机译:不同重量克分子渗透压浓度的润滑剂对干眼患者泪液渗透压和其他泪液功能测试的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: To evaluate the effects of different artificial tear eye drops on Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), tear osmolarity, Schirmer's I test, and tear break-up time (TBUT) in patients with dry eye disease. Materials and methods: This 12-week, single-institution, single-masked, randomized, pilot study was conducted in Turkey between March and July 2012 in patients with dry eye. Patients were randomly assigned to receive Systane? for their right eye and Eyestil? for their left eye or to receive Tears Naturale II? for their right eye and Refresh Tears? for their left eyes. Outcomes were assessed at baseline and weeks 2, 4 and 12 after treatment initiation. Results: Twenty-two patients received Systane (right eye) and Eyestil (left eye) and 21 patients received Tears Naturale (right eye) and Refresh (left eye). At each visit and for each outcome, each treatment group demonstrated a significant improvement from baseline (p<0.001); however, none of these outcomes were significantly different among treatment groups at any visit. At week 12, the mean OSDI improvement was similar between the Systane/Eyestil group (-26.4±10.6) and the Tears Naturale/Refresh group (-27.6±14.8). The mean tear osmolarity decrease (mOsm/L) at week 12 was -33.8±8.3 for Eyestil, -30.3±9.2 for Refresh, -28.4±8.2 for Systane and -25.7±13.1 for Tears Naturale. The mean Schirmer's test increase at week 12 (mm/5min) was 6.7±3.4 for Eyestil, 6.4±2.9 for Systane, 4.7±2.4 for Tears Naturale and 4.7±2.8 for Refresh. The mean TBUT increase at week 12 (s) was 7.0±3.4 for Systane, 6.1±3.3 for Eyestil, 5.8±2.3 for Tears Naturale, and 5.6±2.8 for Refresh. Conclusion: All four artificial tear formulations were effective in relieving dry eye signs and symptoms. Although the greatest improvement in two of the objective tests was achieved by Eyestil, the drug with the lowest osmolality, differences among the four artificial tear eye drops were not statistically significant.
机译:目的:评估干眼病患者不同的人工泪液对眼表疾病指数(OSDI),渗透压摩尔渗透压浓度,Schirmer's I检验和泪液破裂时间(TBUT)的影响。材料和方法:这项为期12周,单机构,单掩蔽,随机,先导的研究于2012年3月至7月之间在土耳其针对干眼症患者进行。患者被随机分配接受Systane?为他们的右眼和Eyestil?他们的左眼还是要接受《自然之泪II》?为他们的右眼和眼泪?为他们的左眼。在基线以及治疗开始后第2、4和12周评估结果。结果:22例患者接受了Systane(右眼)和Eyestil(左眼),还有21例患者接受了Tears Naturale(右眼)和Refresh(左眼)。每次访视和每个结局,每个治疗组均较基线水平有显着改善(p <0.001);然而,在任何访问中,这些结果在治疗组之间均无显着差异。在第12周时,Systane / Eyestil组(-26.4±10.6)和Tears Naturale / Refresh组(-27.6±14.8)之间的平均OSDI改善相似。第12周的平均眼泪渗透压降低(mOsm / L)对于Eyestil为-33.8±8.3,对于“刷新”为-30.3±9.2,对于Systane为-28.4±8.2,对于“自然泪”为-25.7±13.1。第12周(mm / 5min)的Schirmer平均测验增加是Eyestil 6.7±3.4,Systane 6.4±2.9,Tears Naturale 4.7±2.4和Refresh 4.7±2.8。 Systane在第12周的平均TBUT增加为7.0±3.4,Eaststil为6.1±3.3,Tears Naturale为5.8±2.3,Refresh为5.6±2.8。结论:四种人工泪液制剂均能有效缓解干眼症和症状。尽管渗透压最低的药物Eyestil在两项客观测试中取得了最大的进步,但四种人工泪液眼药水之间的差异在统计学上并不显着。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号