首页> 外文期刊>Current Pollution Reports >The Pitfalls and Promise of Ecological Screening Values
【24h】

The Pitfalls and Promise of Ecological Screening Values

机译:生态筛选价值的误区与承诺

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Ecological risk assessment can be a critical part of the site remediation process, with the potential to fundamentally influence the cost and scope of site clean-up. The initial phase of an ecological risk assessment is screening, in which site contaminant concentrations are compared to published ecological screening levels (ESLs) in order to identify contaminants for further evaluation. Risk assessments in most State and Federal programs follow a process in which the identification of one or more contaminants in any sample above respective ESLs may trigger the requirement for a full baseline ecological risk assessment. Full baseline assessments are costly and time consuming, often adding months or years to the project schedule. However, many of screening levels that trigger baseline assessments are not environmentally meaningful and only serve to create unnecessary evaluation. Screening levels are also often misused at later stages of the risk process to draw inappropriate conclusions about ecological hazard. Common problems with the development and application of screening levels are described below, followed by suggestions to improve the screening and risk management processes.
机译:生态风险评估可能是场地修复过程中的关键部分,有可能从根本上影响场地清理的成本和范围。生态风险评估的初始阶段是筛查,将现场污染物的浓度与已公布的生态筛查水平(ESL)进行比较,以识别污染物以进行进一步评估。大多数州和联邦计划中的风险评估都遵循一个过程,在该过程中,对高于各自ESL的任何样品中的一种或多种污染物进行识别可能会触发对完整基准生态风险评估的要求。全面的基准评估成本高昂且耗时,通常会使项目进度增加数月或数年。但是,许多触发基线评估的筛选水平在环境上没有意义,仅用于创建不必要的评估。在风险过程的后期阶段,筛查水平也经常被滥用,以得出关于生态危害的不适当结论。下面介绍了筛选水平的开发和应用中的常见问题,并提出了改进筛选和风险管理流程的建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号