首页> 外文期刊>The journal of physical chemistry, A. Molecules, spectroscopy, kinetics, environment, & general theory >A Comprehensive Assessment of the Effectiveness of Orbital Optimization in Double-Hybrid Density Functionals in the Treatment of Thermochemistry, Kinetics, and Noncovalent Interactions
【24h】

A Comprehensive Assessment of the Effectiveness of Orbital Optimization in Double-Hybrid Density Functionals in the Treatment of Thermochemistry, Kinetics, and Noncovalent Interactions

机译:综合评价双杂化密度函数治疗热化学,动力学和非共价相互作用的轨道优化效果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Orbital optimization (OO) has been suggested as a way to solve some shortcomings of second-order Moller-Plesset (MP2) variants and double-hybrid density functionals (DHDFs). A closer inspection of the literature, however, shows that the only two studies on OO-DHDFs were limited to three nonempirical PBE-based functionals, which are known to be of only mediocre accuracy. Herein, we provide a more in-depth analysis of OO-DHDFs with the main focus being on main-group thermochemistry, kinetics, and noncovalent interactions. We reanalyze two PBE-based OO-DHDFs and present four new OO-DHDF variants, two of which make use of the spin-component-scaling idea in their nonlocal correlation part. We also provide a more thorough analysis of three OO-MP2 variants. After assessing more than 621 reference points, we come to the conclusion that the benefits of OO are not as straightforward as previously thought. Results heavily depend on the underlying parent method. While OO-SCS/SOS-MP2 usually provide improved results-including for noncovalently bound systems-the opposite is true for OO-MP2. OO-DHDFs, like their nonoptimized counterparts, still require London-dispersion corrections. Among the DHDFs, the largest effect of OO on thermochemical properties is seen for PBE0-2 and the smallest for PBE0-DH. However, results can both worsen and improve with OO. If the latter is the case, the resulting OO-DHDF is still outperformed by the currently most accurate conventional DHDFs, namely DSD-BLYP and DSD-PBEP86. We therefore recommend the OO technique only to be used in specialized cases. For the general method user we re-emphasize using conventional dispersion-corrected DHDFs for robust, reliable results. Our findings also indicate that entirely different strategies seem to be required in order to obtain a substantial improvement over the currently best DHDFs.
机译:已经建议轨道优化(OO)作为解决二阶Moller-Plesset(MP2)变体和双混合密度函数(DHDFS)的一些缺点的方法。然而,仔细检查文献,表明,对OO-DHDF的唯一两项研究限于三个非阶PBE的功能,已知仅具有平庸的精度。在此,我们提供了对OO-DHDF的更深入分析,主要焦点是主要群体热化学,动力学和非共价相互作用。我们重新分析了两种基于PBE的OO-DHDFS,并提出了四种新的OO-DHDF变体,其中两个是在非局部相关部件中使用自旋组件缩放思路。我们还提供了对三种OO-MP2变体的更彻底的分析。在评估超过621个参考点之后,我们得出结论,OO的益处与以前认为的那么直截了当。结果严重取决于底层母体方法。虽然OO-SCS / SOS-MP2通常提供改进的结果 - 包括非共价绑定的系统 - 对于OO-MP2,相反是正确的。 oo-DHDFS,如他们的非优化的对应物,仍需要伦敦色散校正。在DHDF中,对PBE0-2和PBE0-DH最小的OO对热化学性质的最大作用。但是,结果既可以恶化和改善。如果后者是这种情况,所得到的OO-DHDF仍然是目前最准确的传统DHDFS,即DSD-BLYP和DSD-PBEP86的优势。因此,我们推荐OO技术仅用于专业案例。对于通用方法用户,我们使用传统的色散校正的DHDFS重新强调,以实现鲁棒,可靠的结果。我们的调查结果还表明,似乎是完全不同的策略,以便对目前最佳的DHDFS获得大量改进。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号