首页> 外文期刊>Current sports medicine reports. >Baseline neuropsychological testing in managing sport-related concussion: does it modify risk?
【24h】

Baseline neuropsychological testing in managing sport-related concussion: does it modify risk?

机译:在管理与运动有关的脑震荡中进行基线神经心理学测试:会改变风险吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Baseline neuropsychological testing is mandated at various levels of play for hundreds of thousands of athletes each year. This paper reviews the risks associated with sport-related concussion, and the clinical validity and reliability data for the most commonly used baseline test, the ImPACT program. There is no evidence to suggest that the use of baseline testing alters any risk from sport-related concussion, nor is there even a good rationale as to how such tests might influence outcome. Given the poor sensitivity and low reliability of these measures, they have an associated high false negative rate (i.e., classifying a player's neurocognitive status is normal, when in fact, it is not). The use of baseline neuropsychological testing, therefore, is not likely to diminish risk, and to the extent that there is a risk associated with "premature" return-to-play, the use of these measures even may increase that risk in some cases.
机译:每年对成千上万的运动员进行不同程度的基线神经心理学测试。本文回顾了与运动相关的脑震荡相关的风险,以及最常用的基线测试ImPACT程序的临床有效性和可靠性数据。没有证据表明基线测试的使用会改变与运动相关的脑震荡的任何风险,甚至也没有关于此类测试如何影响结果的良好理由。鉴于这些措施的敏感性差和可靠性低,因此它们具有较高的假阴性率(即,对运动员的神经认知状态进行分类是正常的,而实际上并非如此)。因此,使用基线神经心理学测试不可能降低风险,并且在一定程度上存在与“过早”重返比赛相关的风险,在某些情况下,使用这些措施甚至可能会增加该风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号