首页> 外文期刊>Current sports medicine reports. >American Society of Hematology opposes sickle cell trait screening: a voice from left field.
【24h】

American Society of Hematology opposes sickle cell trait screening: a voice from left field.

机译:美国血液学会反对镰状细胞性状筛查:来自左视野的声音。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In January 2012, the American Society of Hematology (ASH) weighed in on sports medicine. They issued a policy statement on screening for sickle cell trait (SCT) and athletic participation. The ASH policy opposes the April 2010 National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) policy requiring all Division 1 institutions to screen all incoming athletes for SCT (18).The ASH statement calls for more research, of course, and marshals its opposition into three bullet points: 1) ASH does not support testing or disclosure of SCT status as a prerequisite for participation in athletics, 2) ASH recommends universal interventions to reduce exertion-related injuries and deaths because this approach can be effective for all athletes irrespective of SCT status, and 3) ASH believes the NCAA policy has the potential to harm the athlete and the larger community with SCT (18).I believe ASH is wrong on all three of these forays into sports medicine. After studying the makeup of the ASH workshop that led to this pronouncement, I also wonder about the expertise of ASH in sports medicine. Let me explain.
机译:2012年1月,美国血液学会(ASH)介入了运动医学。他们发表了一项关于镰状细胞性状(SCT)和运动参与筛查的政策声明。 ASH政策与2010年4月美国国家大学体育协会(NCAA)的政策相反,该政策要求所有1级机构对所有新进运动员进行SCT筛检(18).ASH声明要求进行更多研究,并将其反对意见编入三个要点。 :1)ASH不支持测试或披露SCT状态作为参加田径运动的先决条件; 2)ASH建议采取普遍干预措施以减少与运动有关的伤害和死亡,因为这种方法对所有运动员均有效,而与SCT状态无关。 3)ASH认为NCAA政策有可能通过SCT伤害运动员和广大社区(18)。我认为ASH在这三项运动医学研究中都是错误的。在研究了导致这一宣告的ASH讲习班的组成之后,我也想知道ASH在运动医学中的专业知识。让我解释。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号