【24h】

Current Science

机译:当前科学

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

P. Balaram has given a short history of Current Science1. We learn that at the initial stage the journal got support from the editors of Nature, Science and Die Naturwissenschaften. Presumably the founders of Current Science wanted to have a journal like them. In spite of many positive points (such as competent and hard working editorial team, regular publication, peer reviewers and referees, online availability), Current Science has not achieved the same international standard as Nature and Science. According to my modest knowledge, the following steps can be taken to achieve the goal:
机译:P. Balaram给出了《当前科学》的简短历史1。我们了解到,在最初阶段,该期刊获得了《自然》,《科学》和《自然》杂志编辑的支持。据推测,《现代科学》的创始人想拥有一本类似的杂志。尽管有很多积极的方面(例如称职和勤奋的编辑团队,定期出版物,同行评审和裁判,在线提供),但Current Science尚未达到与Nature and Science相同的国际标准。据我所知,可以采取以下步骤来实现该目标:

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号