...
首页> 外文期刊>Surgical Endoscopy >S128: Active post discharge surveillance program as a part of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocol decreases emergency department visits and readmissions in colorectal patients
【24h】

S128: Active post discharge surveillance program as a part of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocol decreases emergency department visits and readmissions in colorectal patients

机译:S128:主动后放电监测计划作为手术协议后恢复增强的一部分,降低了结直肠患者的急诊部门访问和入伍

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs aim to standardize perioperative care to reduce morbidity and cost. Our study examined an Active Post-Discharge Surveillance (APDS) program in reducing avoidable readmissions and emergency department (ED) visits in postoperative colorectal ERAS patients. Methods Colectomy (right, subtotal and total) and low anterior resection cases performed at a tertiary care hospital between 2015 and 2018 were reviewed. ED visits, 30-day readmissions, and patients' APDS participation were assessed. Our APDS followed a modern text messaging paradigm offered to all patients free-of-charge. Results Of 236 patients that underwent colectomy, 123 utilized APDS and 113 did not. Overall, both non-surveillance (NS) and active surveillance (AS) groups had similar preoperative characteristics. Length of hospital stay at index surgery was longer in the NS compared to AS group, 4.7 +/- 2.6 vs. 2.6 +/- 2.8 days, respectively (p < 0.001). In the NS group, 16 patients visited the ED, of which 14 (14/16, 87.5%) were ultimately readmitted. One patient was directly readmitted from the surgeon's office, resulting in a total of 15 (15/113, 13.3%) total patients readmitted by postoperative day (POD) 30. In the AS group, 9 patients visited the ED, of which 7 (7/9, 77.8%) were ultimately readmitted. One patient was directly readmitted, resulting in a total of 8 (8/123, 6.5%) total patients readmitted by POD 30. AS patients had significantly lower odds of visiting the ED when compared to NS patients (OR: 0.356; 95% CI: 0.138-0.919; p = 0.0328). Similarly, AS patients had significantly lower odds of readmission when compared to NS patients (OR: 0.343; 95% CI: 0.132-0.892; p = 0.0283). Conclusions APDS allows many postoperative issues to be resolved in outpatient settings without ER visits or readmission. This indicates APDS is a valuable ERAS adjunct by establishing a cost-effective and convenient communication line between patients and their surgical team.
机译:背景技术在手术(时代)计划后增强恢复旨在标准化围手术期的护理,以降低发病率和成本。我们的研究审查了在术后结肠直肠正式患者中减少避免的阅览和急诊部门(ED)访问中的积极放电监测(APDS)计划。方法审查了2015年至2018年间高级护理医院的联合术(右侧,小细胞和总)和低前剖去病例进行了审查。评估了申请,30天的阅览和患者的APDS参与。我们的APDS遵循现代文本消息传递范式,为所有患者免费提供。结果236例接受过高素质,123名利用APD和113的患者没有。总体而言,非监测(NS)和主动监测(AS)组具有类似的术前特征。与群体相比,NS的医院长度在指数手术中较长,分别为4.7 +/- 2.6与2.6 +/- 2.8天(P <0.001)。在NS组中,16名患者参观了ED,其中14(14/16,87.5%)最终被预留。一名患者从外科医生办公室直接预留,总共15名(15/113,13.3%)术后一天(POD)30所需的患者。在AS组中,9名患者访问了ed,其中7名患者7/9,77.8%最终被预留。一名患者直接被预留,总共8例(8/123,6.5%),总患者提供了POD 30所需的患者。随着与NS患者相比,患者在患者(或:0.356; 95%CI)相比时患者的几率较低。 :0.138-0.919; p = 0.0328)。同样,由于与NS患者相比,随着患者的降低的几率较低(或:0.343; 95%CI:0.132-0.892; P = 0.0283)。结论APDS允许在没有ER访问或入院的情况下在门诊设置中解决许多术后问题。这表明APDS是一种有价值的ERAS辅助,通过在患者与其手术团队之间建立成本效益和方便的通信线路。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号