首页> 外文期刊>Stroke: A Journal of Cerebral Circulation >Classification of Bleeding Events Comparison of ECASS III (European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study) and the New Heidelberg Bleeding Classification
【24h】

Classification of Bleeding Events Comparison of ECASS III (European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study) and the New Heidelberg Bleeding Classification

机译:ECASE III(欧洲合作急性中风研究)和新的海德堡出血分类分类

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background and Purpose-Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) after acute ischemic stroke treatments represents a feared complication with possible prognostic implications. In recent years, ICHs were commonly classified according to the ECASS (European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study). To improve the clinical applicability and relevance, the new Heidelberg Bleeding Classification (HBC) has been proposed in 2015. Here, we compared the ECASS and HBC classification with regard to observed events and prognostic relevance.
机译:急性缺血性卒中治疗后的背景和目的颅内出血(ICH)代表了可能的预后意义的令人担忧的并发症。 近年来,根据ECASS(欧洲合作急性中风研究)通常分类。 为提高临床适用性和相关性,2015年提出了新的海德堡出血分类(HBC)。在这里,我们将Ecass和HBC分类与观察到的事件和预后相关性进行了比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号