首页> 外文期刊>Current Microbiology: An International Journal >Evaluation of the Pseudalert (R)/Quanti-Tray (R) MPN Test for the Rapid Enumeration of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Swimming Pool and Spa Pool Waters
【24h】

Evaluation of the Pseudalert (R)/Quanti-Tray (R) MPN Test for the Rapid Enumeration of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Swimming Pool and Spa Pool Waters

机译:用于游泳池和温泉池水中铜绿假单胞菌快速计数的Pseudalert(R)/ Quanti-Tray(R)MPN测试的评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study assessed the performance of a new most probable number test (Pseudalert (R)/Quanti-Tray (R)) for the enumeration of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from swimming pool and spa pool waters by comparing it to the international and national membrane filtration-based culture methods for P. aeruginosa: ISO 16266:2006 and UK The Microbiology of Drinking Water-Part 8 (MoDW Part 8) which both use Pseudomonas CN agar. The comparison was based on the calculation of mean relative differences between the two methods conducted according to ISO 17994:2014. Using both routine pool water samples (149 from 8 laboratories) and artificially contaminated samples (309 from 7 laboratories), paired counts from each sample and enumeration method were analysed. For routine samples, there were insufficient data for a conclusive assessment, but the data do indicate at least equivalent performance of Pseudalert (R)/Quanti-Tray (R) to the reference methods. For the artificially contaminated samples, the data also did not result in a statistically conclusive assessment but did indicate potentially better performance of Pseudalert (R)/Quanti-Tray (R). Combining the data from the routine samples and artificially contaminated samples resulted in an ISO 17994 outcome that the two methods were not statistically significantly different. Thus, the Pseudalert (R)/Quanti-Tray (R) method is an acceptable alternative to ISO 16266 and MoDW Part 8. The Pseudalert (R)/Quanti-Tray (R) method has the advantage in that it does not require confirmation testing, and of providing confirmed counts within 24-28 h incubation compared to 40-48 h or longer for the ISO 16266 and MoDW Part 8 methods.
机译:这项研究通过与基于国际和国家的膜过滤法进行比较,评估了新的最有可能的数字检验(Pseudalert(R)/ Quanti-Tray(R))对游泳池和温泉池水中铜绿假单胞菌计数的性能。铜绿假单胞菌的培养方法:ISO 16266:2006和英国饮用水微生物学第8部分(MoDW第8部分)均使用假单胞菌CN琼脂。比较是基于根据ISO 17994:2014进行的两种方法之间的平均相对差异的计算。使用常规池水样品(来自8个实验室的149个样品)和人工污染的样品(来自7个实验室的309个样品),对每个样品的配对计数和计数方法进行了分析。对于常规样品,没有足够的数据进行结论性评估,但是数据确实表明Pseudalert(R)/ Quanti-Tray(R)的性能至少与参考方法相当。对于人工污染的样品,数据也未得出统计结论性评估,但确实表明Pseudalert(R)/ Quanti-Tray(R)可能具有更好的性能。将常规样品和人工污染样品的数据结合在一起,得出的ISO 17994结果表明这两种方法在统计学上没有显着差异。因此,Pseudalert(R)/ Quanti-Tray(R)方法是ISO 16266和MoDW Part 8的可接受替代方法。Pseudalert(R)/ Quanti-Tray(R)方法的优点在于不需要确认测试,并提供了在24-28小时的孵育时间内确认的计数,而ISO 16266和MoDW第8部分方法则为40-48小时或更长时间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号