首页> 外文期刊>Stroke: A Journal of Cerebral Circulation >Contact Aspiration Versus Stent Retriever in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke With M2 Occlusion in the ASTER Randomized Trial (Contact Aspiration Versus Stent Retriever for Successful Revascularization)
【24h】

Contact Aspiration Versus Stent Retriever in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke With M2 Occlusion in the ASTER Randomized Trial (Contact Aspiration Versus Stent Retriever for Successful Revascularization)

机译:患有急性缺血性卒中患者的联系人牵引与支架猎犬在艾斯特随机试验中的M2闭塞(接触aspriatiry与支架猎犬成功血运重建)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background and Purpose-Middle cerebral artery M2-segment occlusions represent an important subgroup of patients with acute stroke with large-vessel occlusion. The safety of mechanical thrombectomy, especially contact aspiration (CA), in such distal intracranial occlusions is still under debate. We compared reperfusion, adverse events, neurological recovery, and functional outcome of patients with isolated M2 occlusions according to the first-line strategy mechanical thrombectomy devices (CA versus stent retriever [SR]).
机译:背景和目的 - 中脑动脉M2段闭塞代表急性脑闭塞患者的重要亚组。 机械血栓切除术的安全性,尤其是接触抽吸(CA),在这种远端颅内闭塞中仍在辩论中。 根据第一线策略机械血液切除术装置(CA与支架猎犬[SR])比较了分离的M2闭塞患者的再灌注,不良事件,神经恢复和功能性结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号