首页> 外文期刊>Social science and medicine >Integrating social justice concerns into economic evaluation for healthcare and public health: A systematic review
【24h】

Integrating social justice concerns into economic evaluation for healthcare and public health: A systematic review

机译:将社会正义涉及到医疗保健和公共卫生的经济评估:系统审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Social justice is the moral imperative to avoid and remediate unfair distributions of societal disadvantage. In priority setting in healthcare and public health, social justice reaches beyond fairness in the distribution of health outcomes and economic impacts to encompass fairness in the distribution of policy impacts upon other dimensions of well-being. There is an emerging awareness of the need for economic evaluation to integrate all such concerns. We performed a systematic review (1) to describe methodological solutions suitable for integrating social justice concerns into economic evaluation, and (2) to describe the challenges that those solutions face. To be included, publications must have captured fairness considerations that (a) involve cross-dimensional subjective personal life experience and (b) can be manifested at the level of subpopulations. We identified relevant publications using an electronic search in EMBASE, PubMed, EconLit, Psyclnfo, Philosopher's Index, and Scopus, including publications available in English in the past 20 years. Two reviewers independently appraised candidate publications, extracted data, and synthesized findings in narrative form. Out of 2388 publications reviewed, 26 were included. Solutions sought either to incorporate relevant fairness considerations directly into economic evaluation or to report them alongside cost-effectiveness measures. The majority of reviewed solutions, if adapted to integrate social justice concerns, would require their explicit quantification. Four broad challenges related to the implementation of these solutions were identified: clarifying the normative basis; measuring and determining the relative importance of criteria representing that basis; combining the criteria; and evaluating trade-offs. All included solutions must grapple with an inherent tension: they must either face the normative and operational challenges of quantifying social justice concerns or accede to offering incomplete policy guidance. Interdisciplinary research and broader collaborations are crucial to address these challenges and to support due attention to social justice in priority setting.
机译:社会正义是避免和纠正对社会劣势的不公平分布的道德所必要的。在医疗保健和公共卫生的优先事项中,社会正义达到了健康结果分配和经济影响的公平,以包括对政策的分配的公平影响对幸福的其他方面的影响。有一种新兴意识到经济评估需要整合所有这些这些问题。我们进行了系统审查(1),以描述适合将社会正义涉及经济评估的担忧,(2)描述这些解决方案面临的挑战的方法。要包括在内,出版物必须已经捕获的公平考虑(a)涉及跨智主观个人生活经验,并且(b)可以表现在群体的水平。我们确定了使用Embase,Pubmed,Econlit,Psyclnfo,哲学家指数和Scopus的电子搜索,包括过去20年中英文提供的出版物。两位审稿人以叙事形式独立评估候选出版物,提取数据和合成的调查结果。在2388年出版的出版物中,审查了26份,包括26个。解决方案要么寻求将相关的公平考虑纳入经济评估或向其报告其成本效益措施。大多数审查的解决方案,如果适于整合社会正义问题,需要他们显式的量化。确定了与实施这些解决方案的四种广泛挑战:澄清规范基础;测量和确定代表该基础的标准的相对重要性;结合标准;并评估权衡。所有包括的解决方案必须掌握固有的张力:它们必须面对量化社会正义问题或加入不完整的政策指导的规范性和运营挑战。跨学科研究和更广泛的合作对于解决这些挑战至关重要,并支持在优先设定中适当关注社会正义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号