...
首页> 外文期刊>Nature reviews Cancer >Review of Atmospheric Storage Tank Fire Scenarios: Costs and Causes
【24h】

Review of Atmospheric Storage Tank Fire Scenarios: Costs and Causes

机译:综述大气储罐火灾情景:成本和原因

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Atmospheric storage tank fires are relatively rare, but because of storing large amount of flammable liquid in them, they have catastrophic consequences. This study presents a review of atmospheric storage tank fire scenarios causes and costs. The fire accidents on the atmospheric storage tanks were collected from accident databases, papers and other sources. The causes and costs of the 104 accidents were classified. Initiating event of 38% of the accidents was environmental factors, 20% was equipment factors, 15% was operation factors (human error), 13% was domino effect, 10% was maintenance factor and 4% was terrorist attack. Lightning strikes were the most frequent cause of the accidents triggered by the environmental factors (21.73%). The cost of accidents that have produced domino effects was eight times more than cost of accidents without domino effects. The average cost for accidents that have produced domino effects was approximately 24,181,673$, and for accidents without domino effects, it was 205,191,298$. Identification of storage tank accident causes and cost can provide insights into how managers make cost-benefit analysis and implement effective corrective actions and safety barriers.
机译:大气储罐火灾相对罕见,但由于储存大量的易燃液体,它们具有灾难性的后果。本研究提出了对大气储罐火灾情景的综述原因和成本。从事故数据库,论文和其他来源收集大气储罐上的火灾事故。 104事故的原因和成本分类为分类。启动事件的38%的事故是环境因素,20%是设备因素,15%是操作因素(人体错误),13%是多米诺效应,10%是维持因子,4%是恐怖袭击。雷击是环境因素引发的事故最常见的原因(21.73%)。产生多米诺骨牌效应的事故成本是没有多米诺效应的事故成本的八倍。产生多米诺骨牌效应的事故的平均成本约为24,181,673美元,并且对于没有多米诺骨牌效应的事故,它是205,191,298美元。识别储罐事故原因和成本可以为经理如何制定成本效益分析和实施有效的纠正措施和安全障碍,提供见解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号