首页> 外文期刊>Nature reviews Cancer >Interrogating social work: Australian Social Work and the Stolen Generations
【24h】

Interrogating social work: Australian Social Work and the Stolen Generations

机译:询问社会工作:澳大利亚社会工作和被盗的世代

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the context of Australian social work's "past complicity" in the disadvantaging of Indigenous Australians, this study examined what was said in the journal of the Australian Association of Social Workers about the taking of Indigenous children and the challenges confronting Indigenous Australians during the last two decades of the policies and practices that created what has since been known as the Stolen Generations. A content analysis was undertaken of 23 years of articles in the journal Australian Social Work between 1948 and 1970, the period roughly representing the first two decades of the journal's publication and the last two decades of what was by then a time-honored practice that shaped the lives of thousands of Indigenous children and their families. Findings The study found that very little was said in the journal about the practice in question. Of the 331 articles in the journal within the period, only one article expressly touched on the care of Indigenous children beyond their biological family and community and only one article advanced a critique of the taking of Indigenous children. A landmark change in the constitution affecting all Indigenous Australians came and went without mention. Thus, some of the most important issues affecting the welfare and rights of Indigenous Australians were largely ignored in the professional journal. Applications It is argued that the findings in this study can inform a critical understanding of contemporary social work in different parts of the world.
机译:在澳大利亚社会工作的“过去共同点”在土着澳大利亚人的弊端中,这项研究审查了澳大利亚社会工作者协会关于采取土着儿童的呼气中所说的内容以及在过去两年期间面对土着澳大利亚人面临的挑战几十年来创造了被称为被盗的代代的政策和做法。 1948年至1970年间澳大利亚社会工作期刊的一篇文章的内容分析,该期限大致代表了期刊出版的前二十年的时期和最近二十年的历史悠久的练习成千上万的土着儿童及其家人的生活。调查结果发现,关于关于有关实践的杂志中说得很少。在该期间内的331篇文章中,只有一篇文章明确地触及了土着儿童,超越其生物家庭和社区,只有一篇文章提出了对土着儿童的批评。影响所有土着澳大利亚人的宪法的地标变化来了,没有提到。因此,影响着土着澳大利亚人福利和权利的一些最重要的问题在很大程度上忽略了专业期刊。申请认为,本研究的调查结果可以为世界各地的当代社会工作提供批判性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号