...
首页> 外文期刊>Current medical research and opinion >Clinical acceptability and ease of use of a safety IV catheter system
【24h】

Clinical acceptability and ease of use of a safety IV catheter system

机译:安全静脉导管系统的临床可接受性和易用性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: Occupational risk of transmission of bloodborne pathogens represents a major challenge in prevention. Even though preventive recommendations to avoid needlestick injuries among healthcare workers include the use of needle protective devices, its use in developing countries is not a standard practice. This study aimed to measure, on experienced nurses, perception of performance characteristics and activation of the safety feature of a safety closed IV catheter system (BD Pegasus*), called catheter P, versus a non-safety device (BD Intima II?) called catheter I in healthy volunteers. Method: Fifty-two nurses and 205 healthy volunteers participated in a prospective, randomized, controlled study in a simulated setting. Each nurse performed two insertions of each catheter (one in each forearm) in four study volunteers; the order of insertions was randomly assigned. Statistical analyses were performed to compare the performance of the two catheters regarding Overall Perception of Clinical Acceptability and Ease of Use. Results: Overall acceptance of the device performance characteristics was 90 or more. In all cases, catheter P performed at least as well as catheter I. There were no differences in the insertion success rate between the two devices (93.7 vs. 96.2). Activation of the safety feature of catheter P occurred 99.4. Subjects' perception of pain was similar for both devices. Overall perception of clinical acceptability and ease of use were judged better for catheter P than for catheter I (p=0.006, and p<0.001 respectively). All clinicians strongly agreed that catheter P would protect them from needle stick injuries. Conclusions: Despite the study limitations, mainly its artificial setting and its inability to blind, the results indicate that the Safety Closed IV Catheter System with its safety feature represents a good alternative for IV catheter insertions that can help reduce the incidence of stick injuries in health care workers.
机译:目的:传播血源性病原体的职业风险是预防的主要挑战。尽管为避免医护人员针刺受伤的预防性建议包括使用针头保护装置,但在发展中国家使用它并不是标准做法。这项研究旨在对经验丰富的护士进行测量,以了解安全封闭式IV导管系统(BD Pegasus *)(称为P导管)与非安全装置(BD Intima II?)的性能特征和对安全功能的激活程度。健康志愿者使用导管I。方法:52名护士和205名健康志愿者在模拟环境中参加了一项前瞻性,随机对照研究。每名护士在四名研究志愿者中插入了两个导管(每个前臂一个)。插入顺序是随机分配的。进行统计分析以比较两个导管在临床可接受性和易用性方面的性能。结果:器件性能特征的总体认可度为90或更高。在所有情况下,导管P的性能都至少与导管I相同。两种设备之间的插入成功率没有差异(93.7与96.2)。 99.4发生了导管P安全功能的激活。两种设备的受试者对疼痛的感觉相似。导管P的临床可接受性和易用性总体判断优于导管I(分别为p = 0.006和p <0.001)。所有临床医生都坚决同意导管P可以保护他们免受针刺伤害。结论:尽管存在研究局限性,主要是其人工设置和无盲能力,但结果表明,具有安全功能的安全闭合静脉导管系统可以很好地替代静脉导管插入,可以帮助减少健康状况下粘膜损伤的发生率护理人员。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号