...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Cardiology >Direct comparison of the novel automated screening tool (AST) versus the manual screening tool (MST) in patients with already implanted subcutaneous ICD
【24h】

Direct comparison of the novel automated screening tool (AST) versus the manual screening tool (MST) in patients with already implanted subcutaneous ICD

机译:直接比较新型自动化筛选工具(AST)与手动筛选工具(MST)在已植入皮下ICD的患者中

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) has evolved as a valuable alternative to the transvenous ICD, especially in young patients. Unfortunately, some of these patients are ineligible for S-ICD implantation due to specific electrocardiographic features. So far, these patients were identified by mandatory pre-implantation screening using the manual screening tool (MST), which lacks objective value. Therefore, a novel automated screening tool (AST) has been introduced recently for objective screening, which has not been evaluated yet.
机译:背景:皮下可植入的心脏过热器除颤器(S-ICD)已经发展为乐器ICD的有价值的替代品,特别是在年轻患者中。 不幸的是,由于特定的心电图特征,其中一些患者不需要S-ICD植入。 到目前为止,通过使用手动筛选工具(MST)来鉴定这些患者的鉴定缺乏客观值。 因此,最近已经引入了一种新的自动筛选工具(AST),用于客观筛选,其尚未评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号