首页> 外文期刊>Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care >The importance of amino acids as independent metabolites, signalling molecules and as building blocks for protein
【24h】

The importance of amino acids as independent metabolites, signalling molecules and as building blocks for protein

机译:氨基酸作为独立代谢物,信号分子和蛋白质构成要素的重要性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background and objective: The management of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is dependent on the extent of pulmonary artery obstruction, which is usually evaluated by planar perfusion scanning and CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA). We previously reported that SPECT perfusion scanning is more sensitive than planar scanning for detecting vascular obstruction in CTEPH. The purpose of this study is to compare SPECT with CTPA for detecting segmental pulmonary artery obstruction in CTEPH. Methods: SPECT and CTPA were carried out before pulmonary endarterectomy in 12 CTEPH patients. Field experts documented the anatomical distribution of perfusion defects disclosed by SPECT, the anatomical distribution of pulmonary arterial filling defects disclosed by CTPA and the segmental anatomy of the vascular obstructions based on a review of clinical and pathology records, without knowledge of scan results. Results: Clinical/pathological evaluation disclosed 140 obstructed (15.5 ± 2.5 per patient) and 40 unobstructed lung segments. SPECT scanning identified 87/140 (62%) of the obstructed and 29/40 (72%) of the unobstructed segments. By comparison, CTPA identified 67/140 (47.8%) of the obstructed and 32/40 (80%) of the unobstructed segments. Sensitivity for detecting obstructed segments was significantly higher for SPECT compared with CTPA (62 ± 4.1% vs 47.8 ± 2.9%, respectively; P = 0.03). Conclusions: SPECT is more sensitive than CTPA for identifying obstructed segments in this small sample of CTEPH patients. However, even SPECT under-represents the extent of vascular obstruction from this disease.
机译:背景与目的:慢性血栓栓塞性肺动脉高压(CTEPH)的治疗取决于肺动脉阻塞的程度,这通常通过平面灌注扫描和CT肺血管造影(CTPA)进行评估。我们之前曾报道,SPECT灌注扫描比平面扫描更灵敏,可检测CTEPH中的血管阻塞。这项研究的目的是将SPECT与CTPA进行比较,以检测CTEPH中的节段性肺动脉阻塞。方法:对12例CTEPH患者进行肺动脉内膜切除术前进行SPECT和CTPA检查。现场专家在不了解扫描结果的情况下,根据临床和病理记录,记录了SPECT所揭示的灌注缺陷的解剖学分布,CTPA所揭示的肺动脉充盈缺陷的解剖学分布以及血管阻塞的节段解剖学。结果:临床/病理评估显示140例阻塞(每位患者15.5±2.5)和40例未阻塞的肺段。 SPECT扫描确定了87/140(62%)的阻塞和29/40(72%)的未阻塞段。相比之下,CTPA确定​​了67/140(47.8%)的梗阻段和32/40(80%)的未梗阻段。与CTPA相比,SPECT检测阻塞节段的敏感性显着更高(分别为62±4.1%和47.8±2.9%; P = 0.03)。结论:SPECT比CTPA在此CTEPH患者小样本中识别阻塞段更敏感。但是,即使SPECT也不能代表这种疾病引起的血管阻塞程度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号