【24h】

Patient-physician shared decision making

机译:医患共同决策

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

To the Editor We believe that the Viewpoint by Drs Katz and Hawley on shared decision making inaccurately states its premise and misrepresents the evidence about its effects. Katz and Hawley's position is that the evidence for the effect of shared decision making on medical costs and use is inadequate. In their review of a randomized trial of shared decision making by 2 of us,they suggested that the large observed decreases in medical and surgical admissions and the associated reduction in costs in the intervention group were a result of clinician-directed decisions rather than patient involvement.
机译:致编者我们认为,Katz博士和Hawley博士关于共同决策的观点错误地陈述了其前提,并曲解了其影响的证据。卡茨和霍利的立场是,共同决策对医疗费用和使用产生影响的证据不足。在他们对我们两个人共同决策的随机试验的评论中,他们认为,观察到的大量医疗和手术入院人数减少以及相关的干预组费用减少是临床医生指导的决定而非患者参与的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号