首页> 外文期刊>The pharmaceutical journal >Where next for the RPS?
【24h】

Where next for the RPS?

机译:RPS的下一步是什么?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Given the negative background - the alienation of the old Royal Pharmaceutical Society from its members and its failure as a professional body - the new RPS had a remarkably good first year. As a former Society council member and latterly a member of the English Pharmacy Board, I have been privileged to witness first-hand the transformation that has taken place at Lambeth. So entrenched was the excessive regulatory zeal in the old organisation that it took huge efforts, combined with many newstaff, to bring about the change. The former Society thought it wasbetter than its members, whereasthe new RPS recognises that it is its members. My best guess is that the Society of old would haveretained perhaps 20 per cent of itsmembers (had membership been voluntary) so the fact that we ended up with over 34,000members (around 70 per cent ofthe number of General Pharmaceutical Council registrants) is an excellent resultand a testament to change.Member satisfaction with the organisation is now regularly tracked and the results areencouraging.
机译:考虑到负面背景-旧的皇家药学会与其成员之间的疏远和作为专业机构的失败-新的RPS的第一年表现非常好。作为前协会理事和后来的英国药学委员会委员,我荣幸地亲眼目睹了兰贝斯所发生的变革。旧组织过度的监管热情根深蒂固,以致于付出了巨大的努力,加上许多新员工,才带来了变化。前协会认为它比其会员更好,而新RPS则认识到它是其会员。我最好的猜测是,旧会员协会可能保留了20%的会员(如果会员是自愿会员),因此我们最终拥有超过34,000名会员(约占通用制药理事会注册人的70%),这一事实是一个很好的事实。结果和改变的证明。现在定期跟踪成员对组织的满意度,并且结果令人鼓舞。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号