首页> 外文期刊>The pharmaceutical journal >Is the regulator's premises consultation pharmacy's Great Leap Forward?
【24h】

Is the regulator's premises consultation pharmacy's Great Leap Forward?

机译:监管机构的房地咨询药房是“大跃进”吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

ANYONE who doubts the significance of separating pharmacy's regulator from its leadership body should study carefully the proposed General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC) standards for registered pharmacies. If you think that because you do not own or are the superintendent of a pharmacy, this consultation does not affect you, then you are wrong. Front-line pharmacists are expected to be the eyes and ears of the regulator in raising concerns with their employer about any shortfall in meeting the standards, in particular standard 2.2, which requires the owner or superintendent to ensure professional staff are empowered to exercise their professional judgement in the best interests of patients and the public.
机译:任何怀疑将药房监管机构与领导机构分离的重要性的人都应仔细研究拟议的通用药业委员会(General Pharmaceutical Council,GPhC)注册药房标准。如果您认为由于您不拥有药店或不是药店的负责人,那么本次咨询不会影响您,那么您就是错的。一线药剂师将成为监管者与雇主就满足标准(尤其是标准2.2)方面的不足时所引起的关注的耳朵和耳朵,该标准要求所有人或主管确保专业人员有权行使其专业技能为了患者和公众的最大利益进行判断。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号