首页> 外文期刊>The pharmaceutical journal >The new body must offer benefits to scientists
【24h】

The new body must offer benefits to scientists

机译:新机构必须为科学家带来好处

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

I resigned from the Royal Pharmaceutical Society in December 2004 after 44 years on the Register.The reason was that,as a pharmaceutical scientist consultant,I could not honestly ignore the broad definition of practising now in Article 3(2)of the draft Pharmacy Order:"a person practises or undertakes work as a pharmacist...(if)that person does any work or gives any advice in relation to the preparation,assembly,dispensing,sale,supply or use of medicines,the science of medicines."Clearly,consulting to the industry would contravene that definition and I could not retire from the Register and continue working in biopharmaceutics.My wife chose the option of retiring since she does not provide such advice.
机译:我在英国皇家药学会(RC)登记了44年后,于2004年12月辞职。其原因是,作为一名药物科学家顾问,我不能诚实地忽略《药房令》草案第3条第2款中现在实行的广泛定义。 :“某人以药剂师的身份执业或从事工作……(如果该人从事任何与药物的制备,组装,分配,销售,供应或使用,医学科学有关的工作或提供任何建议”。显然,咨询行业会违反该定义,因此我无法从注册处退休,而无法继续从事生物制药工作。我的妻子选择了退休的选择,因为她没有提供此类建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号