首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Urology >Presence of tumor necrosis is not a significant predictor of survival in clear cell renal cell carcinoma: higher prognostic accuracy of extent based rather than presence/absence classification.
【24h】

Presence of tumor necrosis is not a significant predictor of survival in clear cell renal cell carcinoma: higher prognostic accuracy of extent based rather than presence/absence classification.

机译:肿瘤坏死的存在不是透明细胞肾细胞癌生存的重要预测指标:基于程度而非存在/不存在分类的预后准确性更高。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

PURPOSE: The presence of necrosis has been proposed as an adverse prognostic factor in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. However, classification based on a presence/absence basis ignores its heterogeneity, which may be associated with other important pathological factors and prognosis. We performed the first prospective study of necrosis in clear cell renal cell carcinoma to our knowledge and tested the traditional presence/absence classification vs an alternative extent based classification. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied the presence and extent of tumor necrosis, pathological features and cancer specific survival of 343 consecutive patients. RESULTS: Tumor necrosis was present in 227 tumors (66%) and was associated with more advanced tumors. However, the predictive accuracy for cancer specific survival was low (64.6%) and the presence of necrosis was not retained as an independent prognostic factor on multivariate analysis (p = 0.299). There was significant heterogeneity among tumors with necrosis.Increasing extent of necrosis was associated with poorer performance status, higher T, N, M stages and grades, vascular invasion and sarcomatoid features. Extent based classification predicted cancer specific survival better than presence alone (74.5% vs 64.6%) and was retained as an independent prognostic factor on multivariate analysis (p = 0.029). For clinical use a cutoff of 20% was identified for further prognostic subclassification of tumors with necrosis (c-index 71.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Tumor necrosis is an adverse prognostic factor in clear cell renal cell carcinoma but prospective evaluation of necrosis on a presence/absence basis shows that it does not provide independent prognostic information. The predictive accuracy of an extent based classification is superior and is retained as an independent prognostic factor. We recommend the scoring of necrosis according to its extent with further subclassification based on a 20% cutoff.
机译:目的:坏死的存在已被认为是透明细胞肾细胞癌的不良预后因素。但是,基于存在/不存在的分类忽略了其异质性,异质性可能与其他重要的病理因素和预后相关。据我们所知,我们对透明细胞肾细胞癌的坏死进行了首次前瞻性研究,并测试了传统存在/不存在分类与基于其他范围的分类。材料与方法:我们研究了343例连续患者的肿瘤坏死的存在和程度,病理特征和癌症特异性存活率。结果:227个肿瘤中有肿瘤坏死(66%),并与更晚期的肿瘤有关。然而,对癌症特异性存活率的预测准确性较低(64.6%),在多变量分析中未保留坏死的存在作为独立的预后因素(p = 0.299)。坏死肿瘤之间存在显着的异质性,坏死程度的增加与表现状态较差,T,N,M分期和分级,血管侵犯和肉瘤样特征有关。基于范围的分类预测的癌症特异性生存率优于单独存在(74.5%比64.6%),并且在多变量分析中被保留为独立的预后因素(p = 0.029)。对于临床用途,已确定临界值为20%,可用于进一步诊断坏死性肿瘤亚分类(c指数为71.7%)。结论:肿瘤坏死是透明细胞肾细胞癌的不良预后因素,但根据是否存在坏死来进行前瞻性评估表明,它不提供独立的预后信息。基于范围的分类的预测准确性较高,并且保留为独立的预后因素。我们建议根据坏死的程度评分,并根据20%的临界值进一步细分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号