The accuracy of strong-stretching theory (SST) is examined against a detailed comparison to self-consistent field theory (SCFT) on dry polymeric brushes with thicknesses of up to approx17 times the natural chain extension.The comparison provides the strongest evidence to date that SST represents the exact thick-brush limit of SCFT.More importantly,it allows us to assess the effectiveness of proposed finite-stretching corrections to SST.Including the entropy of the free ends is shown to rectify the most severe inaccuracies in SST.The proximal layer proposed by Likhtman and Semenov provides another significant improvement,and we identify one further effect of similar importance for which there is not yet an accurate treatment.Furthermore,our study provides a valuable means of rejecting mistaken refinements to SST,and indeed one such example is revealed.A proper treatment of finite-stretching corrections is vital to a wide range of phenomena that depend on a small excess free energy,such as autophobic dewetting and the interaction between opposing brushes.
展开▼
