首页> 外文期刊>Urology >Simplified method to measure renal volume: The best correction factor for the ellipsoid formula volume calculation in pretransplant computed tomographic live donor
【24h】

Simplified method to measure renal volume: The best correction factor for the ellipsoid formula volume calculation in pretransplant computed tomographic live donor

机译:简化的肾脏体积测量方法:移植前计算机断层扫描活体供体中椭圆体公式体积计算的最佳校正因子

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective To find an optimal correction factor that will produce a near-real renal volume calculation using the ellipsoid formula. Methods We retrospectively studied 79 multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) examinations for potential renal donor assessment. The renal volumes were calculated using the slice summation method, the ellipsoid formula with π/6 as correction factors as well multiple other correction factors for statistical analysis. A paired Student t test was used for evaluating the volumes calculated with different correction factors and the volumes calculated by the slice summation method. Results The ellipsoid formula using correction factor 0.524 underestimates the renal volume by approximately 22.2% with statistical difference compared with the slice summation method (P <.05). There is no statistical difference when using correction factor in the range of 0.664 to 0.686 (P >.05). Further subgroup analysis of gender and laterality was performed and revealed no statistical difference. Using a mean value of 0.674 or 0.67 as correction factor results in renal volumes that are 100% and 99.5%. Conclusion To avoid underestimation of the renal volume by the ellipsoid method, acceptable correction factors are in the range of 0.664 to 0.686. We suggest the use of a mean value of 0.674 or 0.67 as correction factor when using the ellipsoid formula.
机译:目的寻找最佳校正因子,以使用椭球公式计算肾体积。方法我们回顾性研究了79台多层计算机断层扫描(MDCT)检查,以进行潜在的肾脏供体评估。使用切片求和法,以π/ 6作为校正因子的椭球公式以及多个其他校正因子进行肾脏体积的统计分析。配对的Student t检验用于评估使用不同校正因子计算的体积和通过切片求和方法计算的体积。结果与切片求和法相比,使用校正因子0.524的椭球公式低估了肾脏体积约22.2%,具有统计学差异(P <.05)。使用0.664至0.686(P> .05)范围内的校正因子时,没有统计差异。对性别和偏侧性进行了进一步的亚组分析,结果显示无统计学差异。使用0.674或0.67的平均值作为校正因子会导致肾脏体积分别为100%和99.5%。结论为了避免通过椭球法低估肾脏体积,可接受的校正因子在0.664至0.686的范围内。我们建议在使用椭球公式时使用0.674或0.67的平均值作为校正因子。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Urology》 |2014年第6期|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号