...
首页> 外文期刊>Cornea >Comparison of Anterior Segment Measurements With a Dual Scheimpflug Placido Corneal Topographer and a New Partial Coherence Interferometer in Keratoconic Eyes
【24h】

Comparison of Anterior Segment Measurements With a Dual Scheimpflug Placido Corneal Topographer and a New Partial Coherence Interferometer in Keratoconic Eyes

机译:双Scheimpflug Placido角膜地形图仪和新型部分相干干涉仪在角膜肥厚性眼中前节测量的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose:To evaluate the repeatability and agreement of the anterior segment measurements obtained using the Galilei dual Scheimpflug analyzer (Galilei DSA; Ziemer) and Nidek AL Scan (Nidek CO, Aichi, Japan) biometry in keratoconic and normal eyes.Methods:Three consecutive measurements were performed by the same examiner using both devices in 62 healthy and 88 keratoconic eyes. Central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth, keratometry readings (K) [in flattest meridian (Kf), in steepest meridian (Ks), and mean (Km)], and white-to-white distance were evaluated. Repeatability was assessed by calculating the within-subject SD and coefficient of variation. The agreement between both devices was assessed using the Bland-Altman method.Results:Both devices achieved excellent repeatability for all parameters in each group. The 95% limits of agreement (LoA) between both devices were also very narrow and acceptable for all parameters in normal corneas. However, the 95% LoA for agreement was large for CCT and measurements related to K (Kf, Ks, and Km) using both 2.4 and 3.3 mm in keratoconic eyes. In addition, compared with the Galilei DSA, K values of the Nidek AL Scan using a diameter of 3.3 mm showed slightly closer 95% LoA than those obtained using a diameter of 2.4 mm.Conclusions:In normal eyes, the Galilei DSA and Nidek AL Scan can be used interchangeably for anterior segment measurements. In keratoconic eyes, both devices yielded interchangeable anterior chamber depth and white-to-white distance measurements, whereas CCT and keratometry measurements showed clinically significant differences.
机译:目的:评估使用Galilei双Scheimpflug分析仪(Galilei DSA; Ziemer)和Nidek AL Scan(日本爱知县Nidek CO)生物测定法在圆锥角膜和正常眼睛中获得的前节测量结果的可重复性和一致性。由同一名检查者使用这两种设备对62只健康的眼睛和88个圆锥形圆锥的眼睛进行了检查。评估了中央角膜厚度(CCT),前房深度,角膜曲率读数(K)[在最平坦的子午线(Kf),最陡的子午线(Ks)和平均值(Km)中]和白到白距离。通过计算受试者内部的SD和变异系数评估可重复性。使用Bland-Altman方法评估了两种设备之间的一致性。结果:两种设备在每组中的所有参数上均具有出色的可重复性。两种设备之间的协议一致性(LoA)的95%范围也非常狭窄,对于正常角膜中的所有参数而言都是可以接受的。然而,对于CCT和使用圆锥角锥眼使用2.4和3.3 mm的K(Kf,Ks和Km)进行的测量,协议的95%LoA很大。此外,与Galilei DSA相比,使用3.3 mm直径的Nidek AL Scan的K值显示LoA略高于使用2.4 mm直径获得的LoA 95%。结论:在正常眼睛中,Galilei DSA和Nidek AL扫描可互换用于前节测量。在圆锥角膜眼中,两种装置均可产生可互换的前房深度和白到白距离测量值,而CCT和角膜曲率测量结果显示出临床上的显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号