...
首页> 外文期刊>Croatian medical journal >Comparison and evaluation of different methodologies and tests for detection of antidsdna antibodies on 889 Slovenian patients' and blood donors' sera
【24h】

Comparison and evaluation of different methodologies and tests for detection of antidsdna antibodies on 889 Slovenian patients' and blood donors' sera

机译:比较和评估889种斯洛文尼亚患者和献血者血清中抗dsdna抗体检测方法和测试的不同

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Aim: To evaluate four different commercially available assays for anti-double stranded DNA (dsDNA) detection and compare them with the in-house radioimmunoassay according to Farr (FARR-RIA) in order to select the optimal primary method for use in combination with FARR-RIA. Methods: Sera from 583 consecutive patients sent to our laboratory for routine diagnosis, 156 selected patients with autoimmune diseases (76 systemic lupus erythematosus [SLE] patients and 80 patients with other autoimmune diseases), and 150 blood donors were tested for anti-dsDNA antibodies with two enzyme-linked immunoassays (ELISA), two Crithidia luciliae immunoflourescence tests (CLIFT), and FARR-RIA. The specificities and sensitivities of the tests were calculated and compared. Results: FARR-RIA and CLIFT 2 showed the highest specificity for SLE (100%), with CLIFT 2 showing higher sensitivity (33% vs 47%). Both ELISAs showed higher sensitivities (>53%) than FARR-RIA but lower specificities (<93%), whereas CLIFT 1 showed the lowest overall agreement with FARR-RIA. Conclusion: CLIFT 2 was selected as the primary test for use in combination with FARR-RIA. The use of CLIFT 2 reduced the number of sera that needed to be tested by FARR-RIA, the time needed to report the results, and environmental toxicity, cancerogenicity, and radioactivity.
机译:目的:评估四种不同的可用于检测抗双链DNA(dsDNA)的商业化检测方法,并将其与根据Farr(FARR-RIA)进行的室内放射免疫检测法进行比较,以选择与FARR结合使用的最佳主要方法-RIA。方法:连续583例患者的血清被送往我们的实验室进行常规诊断,选择了156例自身免疫性疾病患者(76例系统性红斑狼疮[SLE]患者和80例其他自身免疫性疾病患者),并对150名献血者进行了抗dsDNA抗体检测进行了两次酶联免疫测定(ELISA),两次十字绣夜蛾免疫荧光测试(CLIFT)和FARR-RIA。计算并比较了测试的特异性和敏感性。结果:FARR-RIA和CLIFT 2对SLE的特异性最高(100%),而CLIFT 2显示的敏感性更高(33%对47%)。两种ELISA均显示出比FARR-RIA更高的敏感性(> 53%),但特异性更低(<93%),而CLIFT 1显示出与FARR-RIA的总体一致性最低。结论:选择CLIFT 2作为与FARR-RIA结合使用的主要测试。 CLIFT 2的使用减少了需要通过FARR-RIA测试的血清数量,报告结果所需的时间以及环境毒性,致癌性和放射性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号