首页> 外文期刊>Creativity Research Journal >Evaluative Aspects of Creative Thought: Effects of Appraisal and Revision Standards
【24h】

Evaluative Aspects of Creative Thought: Effects of Appraisal and Revision Standards

机译:创造性思维的评价方面:评估和修订标准的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Recent research has begun to stress the influence of evaluation on creative thought. The authors begin this article by arguing that the evaluation of new ideas is a complex process involving forecasting, appraisal, and revision, where different standards might be applied to different ideas during appraisal and revision. The influence of appraisal and revision standards on creative problem solving was examined by asking 148 undergraduates to appraise and revise highly original, original, and nonoriginal ideas generated for an advertising campaign under conditions in which the standards to be applied stressed the generation of new ideas or under conditions in which the standards to be applied stressed efficiency of current operations. It was found that better plans for these advertising campaigns were obtained when generative, or innovative, criteria were applied to less original ideas and when implementation efficiency, or operating, criteria were applied to more original ideas. It was concluded that evaluation may serve to remediate deficiencies in ideas but that the standards applied must vary with the nature of the idea and the context in which it is to be implemented.
机译:最近的研究已经开始强调评估对创造性思维的影响。作者在开始本文时认为,对新思想的评估是一个复杂的过程,涉及预测,评估和修订,其中在评估和修订过程中,不同的标准可能会应用于不同的思想。评估和修订标准对创造性问题解决的影响是通过要求148名大学生评估和修订为广告活动产生的高度原创,原始和非原创性想法而进行的,这些条件是要应用的标准强调了新思想或新思想的产生。在要应用的标准强调当前运营效率的条件下。人们发现,当将生成或创新标准应用于较少的原始创意时,以及将实施效率或运营标准应用于更多的原始创意时,将为这些广告活动获得更好的计划。得出的结论是,评价可能有助于纠正观念中的缺陷,但所采用的标准必须随观念的性质和实施观念的背景而变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号