首页> 外文期刊>Critical care : >Pro/con clinical debate: It is acceptable to stop large multicentre randomized controlled trials at interim analysis for futility. Pro: Futility stopping can speed up the development of effective treatments.
【24h】

Pro/con clinical debate: It is acceptable to stop large multicentre randomized controlled trials at interim analysis for futility. Pro: Futility stopping can speed up the development of effective treatments.

机译:Pro / con临床辩论:在中期分析中停止无效的大型多中心随机对照试验是可以接受的。优点:停止徒劳无功可以加快有效治疗的发展。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

A few recent, large, well-publicized trials in critical care medicine have been stopped for futility. In the critical care setting, stopping for futility means that independent review committees have elected to stop the trial early--based on predetermined rules--since the likelihood of finding a treatment effect is low. For bedside clinicians the idea of futility in a clinical trial can be confusing. In the present article, two experts in the conduct of clinical trials debate the role of futility-stopping rules.
机译:由于徒劳无功,最近已停止了一些大规模的,广为宣传的重症监护医学试验。在重症监护环境中,由于徒劳无功而停止意味着独立的审查委员会选择根据预定的规则尽早停止试验,因为发现治疗效果的可能性很低。对于床边临床医生来说,在临床试验中徒劳无益的想法可能令人困惑。在本文中,两名从事临床试验的专家讨论了无效终止规则的作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号