首页> 外文期刊>Contraception >Use of contraceptive methods and contraceptive recommendations among health care providers actively involved in contraceptive counseling - Results of an international survey in 10 countries
【24h】

Use of contraceptive methods and contraceptive recommendations among health care providers actively involved in contraceptive counseling - Results of an international survey in 10 countries

机译:在积极参与避孕咨询的卫生保健提供者中使用避孕方法和避孕建议-在10个国家进行的国际调查结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background: This study was conducted to determine the personal choices of contraceptive methods among an international sample of contraception health care professionals (HCPs) and to determine if these choices are concordant with their recommendations to women. Study Design: In an anonymous online survey, 1001 HCPs actively involved in contraceptive counseling [obstetrician/ gynecologists (OB/GYNs), general practitioners (GPs) and midwives (only in Sweden)] from 10 countries (Australia, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Korea, Mexico, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom) were asked about their personal use of contraceptive methods and their recommendations to women in two different clinical scenarios: for spacing between children (Group A) and after completion of the family (Group B). Results: The largest HCP group was OB/GYNs (67.1%), followed by GPs (31.4%) and midwives (1.5%). A total of 42.7% of respondents were male, and 57.3% were female. The majority of respondents were aged 36-45 years (38.9%) or 46-55 years (42.8%), 79.7% had children, and 53.9% were currently using contraception (by themselves or by their partners). Among 540 contraceptive users, the three most common methods were the levonorgestrel- releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS; 29.3%), combined oral contraceptives (COCs; 20.0%) and condoms (17.0%). OB/GYNs were more likely to be using the LNG-IUS than GPs (p=.014). Gender did not seem to influence contraceptive preference. Reasons for these choices were largely influenced by family situation and high contraceptive efficacy (for the LNG-IUS) or side effects caused by other methods (for condoms). The top contraceptive recommendation was COCs for Group A and the LNG-IUS for Group B. HCPs currently using COCs and the LNG-IUS were more likely to recommend these methods than other contraceptive methods for Group A and Group B, respectively. Conclusions: The most popular contraceptive method in this sample of HCPs was the LNG-IUS. Choice of contraceptive method was driven by family situation, age and profession. It appears that, in this sample, personal contraceptive use influences contraceptive recommendations.
机译:背景:本研究旨在确定国际避孕保健专业人员样本中避孕方法的个人选择,并确定这些选择是否与他们对妇女的建议相符。研究设计:在一项匿名的在线调查中,来自10个国家(澳大利亚,巴西,加拿大,法国)的1001名HCP积极参与避孕咨询[妇产科医生(OB / GYNs),全科医生(GPs)和助产士(仅在瑞典)]。 ,德国,韩国,墨西哥,西班牙,瑞典和英国)被问及他们在两种不同的临床情况下个人使用避孕方法的情况以及对妇女的建议:孩子之间的间隔(A组)和家庭结成之后( B组)。结果:最大的HCP组是OB / GYN(67.1%),其次是GP(31.4%)和助产士(1.5%)。共有42.7%的受访者是男性,而57.3%是女性。大多数受访者年龄在36-45岁之间(38.9%)或46-55岁(42.8%),有79.7%的孩子,目前有53.9%的孩子正在使用避孕药(由他们自己或他们的伴侣)。在540名避孕药使用者中,三种最常用的方法是释放左炔诺孕酮的子宫内系统(LNG-IUS; 29.3%),联合口服避孕药(COC; 20.0%)和避孕套(17.0%)。与GP相比,OB / GYN更可能使用LNG-IUS(p = .014)。性别似乎并未影响避孕偏好。这些选择的原因在很大程度上受到家庭状况和高避孕功效(对于LNG-IUS)或其他方法引起的副作用(对于避孕套)的影响。最高的避孕建议是A组的COC和B组的LNG-IUS。与A组和B组的其他避孕方法相比,当前使用COC和LNG-IUS的HCP更可能推荐这些方法。结论:在这种HCP样本中,最流行的避孕方法是LNG-IUS。避孕方法的选择取决于家庭状况,年龄和职业。在这个样本中,似乎个人使用避孕药具会影响避孕建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号