...
首页> 外文期刊>Analytica chimica acta >Application and comparison of four selected procedures for the isolation of cell-wall material from the skin of grapes cv. Monastrell
【24h】

Application and comparison of four selected procedures for the isolation of cell-wall material from the skin of grapes cv. Monastrell

机译:从葡萄皮中分离细胞壁材料的四种选择方法的应用和比较。莫纳斯特雷尔

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In order to choose an appropriate cell-wall material (CWM) isolation procedure in grapes cv. Monastrell, four different standard procedures have been tested, and a comparison made of the amount of cell-wall material obtained, its composition and morphology. The CWM was isolated as the 70% ethanol insoluble residue (de Vries method), as the absolute ethanol insoluble residue filtered sequentially through nylon mesh (Nunan method), as the insoluble residue in sodium deoxycholate-phenol-acetic acid-water (Selvendran method) and as the N-[2-hydroxyethyl]-piperazine-N'-2-ethanesulfonic acid (HEPES) insoluble residue (Vidal method). All extractions were done in triplicate and the efficiency of the extractive procedure established. Carbohydrates, proteins, and phenolic compounds were analysed, as the main constituents of CWM. The morphology of the isolated CWM was visualized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The Selvendran method had the highest efficiency, while the Nunan method had the lower one. Regarding the carbohydrates composition, the four different CWM were rich in uronic acids and glucose, together with varying amounts of arabinose, xylose, mannose and galactose. The Selvendran method had the lower value of total carbohydrates and the CWM shows more plasmatic membrane impurities in SEM images. The chemical results of the Vidal and de Vries methods were quite similar, but the Vidal method was more time consuming than the de Vries method. According to the results, the de Vries method was chosen to produce a representative cell-wall material fraction from Monastrell grapes skin.
机译:为了在葡萄中选择合适的细胞壁材料(CWM)隔离程序。 Monastrell已测试了四种不同的标准程序,并对获得的细胞壁材料的数量,其组成和形态进行了比较。分离出CWM为70%乙醇不溶残留物(de Vries方法),绝对乙醇不溶残留物依次通过尼龙网过滤(Nunan方法),作为脱氧胆酸钠-苯酚-乙酸-水(Selvendran方法)中不溶残留物)和N- [2-羟乙基]-哌嗪-N'-2-乙磺酸(HEPES)不溶性残基(维达尔法)。所有提取均重复三次,并确定提取程序的效率。分析了碳水化合物,蛋白质和酚类化合物,作为CWM的主要成分。通过扫描电子显微镜(SEM)观察分离的CWM的形态。 Selvendran方法的效率最高,而Nunan方法的效率较低。关于碳水化合物的组成,四种不同的CWM富含糖醛酸和葡萄糖,以及不同量的阿拉伯糖,木糖,甘露糖和半乳糖。 Selvendran方法的总碳水化合物值较低,而CWM在SEM图像中显示出更多的质膜杂质。 Vidal和de Vries方法的化学结果非常相似,但是Vidal方法比de Vries方法更耗时。根据结果​​,选择了de Vries方法从Monastrell葡萄皮中生产出具有代表性的细胞壁物质。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号