...
首页> 外文期刊>Analytica chimica acta >Selecting the optimum number of partial least squares components for the calibration of attenuated total reflectance-mid-infrared spectra of undesigned kerosene samples
【24h】

Selecting the optimum number of partial least squares components for the calibration of attenuated total reflectance-mid-infrared spectra of undesigned kerosene samples

机译:选择最优数量的偏最小二乘分量进行未设计的煤油样品的衰减全反射-中红外光谱的校正

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Selecting the correct dimensionality is critical for obtaining partial least squares (PLS) regression models with good predictive ability. Although calibration and validation sets are best established using experimental designs, industrial laboratories cannot afford such an approach. Typically, samples are collected in an (formally) undesigned way, spread overtime and their measurements are included in routine measurement processes. This makes it hard to evaluate PLS model dimensionality. In this paper, classical criteria (leave-one-out cross-validation and adjusted Wold's criterion) are compared to recently proposed alternatives (smoothed PLS-PoLiSh and a randomization test) to seek out the optimum dimensionality of PLS models. Kerosene (jet fuel) samples were measured by attenuated total reflectance-mid-IR spectrometry and their spectra where used to predict eight important properties determined using reference methods that are time-consuming and prone to analytical errors. The alternative methods were shown to give reliable dimensionality predictions when compared to external validation. By contrast, the simpler methods seemed to be largely affected by the largest changes in the modeling capabilities of the first components. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:选择正确的尺寸对于获得具有良好预测能力的偏最小二乘(PLS)回归模型至关重要。尽管最好使用实验设计来建立校准和验证集,但是工业实验室无法承受这种方法。通常,样品以(正式)未设计的方式收集,随时间推移分布并且其测量值包括在常规测量过程中。这使得很难评估PLS模型的维数。在本文中,将经典标准(留一法交叉验证和调整的Wold准则)与最近提出的替代方法(平滑的PLS-PoLiSh和随机化测试)进行比较,以找出PLS模型的最佳尺寸。煤油(喷气燃料)样品是通过衰减全反射中红外光谱法测量的,其光谱可用于预测使用参考方法测定的八项重要特性,这些参考方法耗时且容易出现分析误差。与外部验证相比,显示了替代方法可以提供可靠的尺寸预测。相比之下,较简单的方法似乎在很大程度上受到第一个组件的建模功能最大变化的影响。 (c)2006 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号