首页> 外文期刊>Cortex: A Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior >Forgetting due to retroactive interference: a fusion of Muller and Pilzecker's (1900) early insights into everyday forgetting and recent research on anterograde amnesia.
【24h】

Forgetting due to retroactive interference: a fusion of Muller and Pilzecker's (1900) early insights into everyday forgetting and recent research on anterograde amnesia.

机译:由于追溯性干扰而遗忘:Muller和Pilzecker(1900)对日常遗忘的早期见解和顺行性健忘症的最新研究的融合。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Ebbinghaus' seminal work suggested that forgetting occurred as a function of time. However, it raised a number of fundamental theoretical issues that still have not been resolved in the literature. Muller and Pilzecker (1900) addressed some of these issues in a remarkable manner but their observations have been mostly ignored in recent years. Muller and Pilzecker (1900) showed that the materials and the task that intervene between presentation and recall may interfere with the to-be-remembered items, and they named this phenomenon "retroactive interference" (RI). They further asked whether there is a type of RI that is based only on distraction, and not on the similarity between the memoranda and the interfering stimuli. Their findings, and our follow up research in healthy volunteers and amnesiacs, confirm that forgetting can be induced by any subsequent mentally effortful interpolated task, irrespective of its content; the interpolated "interfering" material does not have to be similar to the to-be-remembered stimuli.
机译:埃宾豪斯(Ebbinghaus)的开创性著作表明,遗忘是时间的函数。但是,它提出了一些基本的理论问题,文献中仍未解决。 Muller and Pilzecker(1900)以非凡的方式解决了其中一些问题,但近年来,他们的观察大多被忽略了。 Muller and Pilzecker(1900)指出,在表示和回忆之间进行干预的材料和任务可能会干扰要记住的项目,他们将此现象称为“追溯干扰”(RI)。他们进一步询问是否存在仅基于注意力分散而不是基于备忘录和干扰刺激之间相似性的RI类型。他们的发现以及我们对健康志愿者和健忘症的跟踪研究证实,以后进行的任何费力的内插任务都可能导致遗忘,无论其内容如何;内插的“干扰”材料不必与要记忆的刺激相似。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号