...
首页> 外文期刊>Acta Horticulturae >Non-chemical alternatives for weed control in containerized plants.
【24h】

Non-chemical alternatives for weed control in containerized plants.

机译:集装箱植物除杂草的非化学替代品。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Weeds are a serious problem in nursery for container production, because air, nutrient and water are limited by the container volume. Chemical weeding is the main method to control weeds in nurseries but problems as proper calibration, herbicide run-off, need for multiple applications and product cost must be taken into account. The aim of this work was to investigate the degradation time and cost of some environmental-friendly materials used to control weeds in three widely used container-grown shrubs (Photinia x fraseri 'Red Robin', Prunus laurocerasus 'Rotundifolia', Thuja plicata 'Atrovirens'). 120 plants per species were potted into 3 L containers. Four non-chemical mulching materials were used: (1) coconut fibre discs; (2) vegetal and synthetic fibre discs; (3) viscose fibre discs; (4) a mineral grain mixture without chemical additives (GervalReg.). The effectiveness of these materials was compared with a chemical control (oxadiazon) and with a hand weeding control. Weeds in container were counted and removed every 45 days during two growing seasons (2006 and 2007). Plant height and biomass were recorded at the beginning and at the end of the trial. Vegetal/synthetic fibre discs allowed a weed control as good as the chemical in all the species tested. Due to its short duration this material was replaced at the beginning of the second growing season. Coconut discs and GervalReg. assured a satisfying weed control. No differences between these treatments and vegetal/synthetic fibre discs were found. These materials were applied at the beginning of the experiment and were not replaced in the second year. Serious damages to the root flare were caused by GervalReg.. The viscose fibre discs did not allow a satisfying weed control, because of their quick degradation, and they had to be replaced during the trial. No significant differences in plant height and biomass production were found among treatments. Total cost of weed control (including installation) in the two years of the trial was 0.19 Euro/pot for coconut discs and 0.20 Euro/pot for vegetal/synthetic fibre discs. Chemical control allowed weed control with half of the cost, but this value does not take into account chemical externalities and a possible rise of resistances in weeds. Costs of GervalReg., viscose fibre discs and manual weed removal did not give a result acceptable for nursery production.
机译:杂草在用于容器生产的苗圃中是一个严重的问题,因为空气,养分和水受容器体积的限制。化学除草是控制苗圃杂草的主要方法,但是必须考虑到诸如正确校准,除草剂流失,需要多次施用和产品成本等问题。这项工作的目的是研究用于控制三种广泛使用的容器种植灌木( Photinia x fraseri '红色罗宾”,“李属李”,“圆叶菊”,“金钟柏”,“特罗维伦”)。将每个物种120株植物盆栽到3 L容器中。使用了四种非化学覆盖材料:(1)椰子纤维圆盘; (2)植物和合成纤维盘; (3)粘胶纤维盘; (4)不含化学添加剂的矿物谷物混合物(GervalReg。)。将这些材料的有效性与化学防治(草二唑)和人工除草防治进行了比较。在两个生长季节(2006年和2007年)中,每45天对容器中的杂草进行计数并清除。在试验开始和结束时记录植物的高度和生物量。植物/合成纤维圆盘在所有测试物种中的除草效果均与化学药品一样好。由于持续时间短,该材料在第二个生长季节开始时已被替换。椰子圆盘和GervalReg。确保了令人满意的除草效果。在这些处理和植物/合成纤维盘之间没有发现差异。这些材料在实验开始时就已使用,第二年未更换。 GervalReg对根部耀斑造成了严重损害。粘胶纤维盘由于其快速降解而不能令人满意地控制杂草,因此必须在试验期间进行更换。处理之间没有发现植物高度和生物量产生显着差异。在两年的试验中,杂草控制的总成本(包括安装费用)对于椰子圆盘为0.19欧元/盆,对于植物/合成纤维圆盘为0.20欧元/盆。化学防治使杂草防治成本降低了一半,但该值未考虑化学外部性和杂草抗性的可能提高。 GervalReg。,粘胶纤维盘和人工除草的成本无法为苗圃生产提供可接受的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号