【24h】

Need for more science academies?

机译:需要更多的科学学院吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The purpose of this letter is to question the wisdom of the recently introduced policy of paying an honorarium of Rs 15,000 pm, up to the age of superannuation, to those who have either been awarded the Shanti Swarup Bhatnagar Prize or are Fellows of at least two of the four national science and engineering academies of India (INSA, IASc, NASc and INAE). It has also been remarked by some that such Prizes and Fellowships do not always go to the most deserving. There has been some discussion on these matters in recent issues of Current Science1–4. Focussing first on the Bhatnagar Prize, luck (such as in one particular subject or in one particular year, the number of deserving candidates may be fewer than usual, making it easier for someone to get an award), the ability to network effectively and working in a fashionable area of research play a role not infrequently. In some cases, the difference between someone who wins an award and someone who does not may be insignificant and very subjective.
机译:这封信的目的是质疑最近出台的政策的明智性,该政策向那些已获得尚蒂·斯杜鲁普·巴特那加奖或至少有两个奖学金的获奖者支付高达15,000卢比的酬金(直至退休年龄)印度的四个国家科学和工程学院(INSA,IASc,NASc和INAE)中的一所。一些人还指出,此类奖品和奖学金并不总是得到最应得的。在《最新科学》 1-4期中,对这些问题进行了一些讨论。首先关注Bhatnagar奖的运气(例如,在某一特定主题或某一特定年份,应得的候选人数量可能比平时少,这使得某人更容易获得奖项),有效地联网和工作的能力在时尚的研究领域中,作用并不罕见。在某些情况下,获得奖项的人与没有获奖的人之间的区别可能微不足道且非常主观。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号