首页> 外文期刊>Conservation Biology >Assessing the value of the umbrella-species concept for conservation planning with meta-analysis [Evaluación del Valor del Concepto de Especie Sombrilla para la Planificación de la Conservación Mediante Meta-Análisis]
【24h】

Assessing the value of the umbrella-species concept for conservation planning with meta-analysis [Evaluación del Valor del Concepto de Especie Sombrilla para la Planificación de la Conservación Mediante Meta-Análisis]

机译:通过荟萃分析评估伞形物种概念在保护规划中的价值[通过荟萃分析评估伞形物种概念在自然保护规划中的价值]

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The umbrella-species concept, which suggests that conservation strategies designed for one species may benefit co-occurring species, has been promoted as a framework for conservation planning. Nevertheless, there has been considerable variation in the outcome of empirical tests of this concept that has led researchers to question its value, so we used data from 15 published studies in a meta-analysis to evaluate whether conservation of putative umbrella species also conserves co-occurring species. We tested the effectiveness of putative umbrella species categorized by taxonomic group, taxonomic similarity to co-occurring species, body size, generality of resource use, and trophic level to evaluate criteria proposed to guide the selection of umbrella species. We compared species richness and number of individuals (by species and higher taxonomic group) between sites with and without putative umbrella species to test whether more co-occurring species were present in greater abundances when the area or resource needs of umbrella species were met. Species richness and abundance of co-occurring species were consistently higher in sites where umbrella species were present than where they were not and for conservation schemes with avian than with mammalian umbrella species. There were no differences in species richness or species abundance with resource generalist or specialist umbrella species or based on taxonomic similarity of umbrella and co-occurring species. Taxonomic group abundance was higher in across-taxonomic umbrella species schemes than when umbrella species were of the same taxon as co-occurring species. Co-occurring species had similar, or higher, species richness with small-bodied umbrella species relative to larger-bodied umbrella species. The only significant difference among umbrella species categorized by trophic level was that species richness was higher with omnivorous than it was with carnivorous avian umbrella species. Our results suggest there is merit to the umbrella-species concept for conservation, but they do not support the use of the criteria we used to identify umbrella species.
机译:总括物种的概念已被提倡作为保护规划的框架,该概念表明为一种物种设计的保护策略可能会使同时存在的物种受益。尽管如此,该概念的经验测试结果还是存在很大差异,这导致研究人员对其价值提出了质疑。因此,我们在一项荟萃分析中使用了15项已发表研究的数据,以评估推定的伞形物种的保存是否还保存了共同保护。发生的物种。我们测试了按分类组分类的假定伞形物种的有效性,与共生物种的分类相似性,体型,资源利用的普遍性和营养水平,以评估指导伞形物种选择的标准。我们比较了有和没有假定伞形物种的地点之间的物种丰富度和个体数量(按物种和较高的分类组),以测试当满足伞形物种的面积或资源需求时,是否同时存在更多的共生物种。在存在伞形物种的地方,共生物种的物种丰富度和丰度始终高于不存在伞形物种的地方,对于鸟类来说,与鸟类的保护计划相比,哺乳动物的伞形物种更加丰富。物种丰富度或物种丰富度与资源通配或专业的伞形物种没有区别,也没有基于伞形和共生物种的分类相似性。在跨分类的伞形物种计划中,分类群的丰度要高于与共同出现的物种属于同一分类单元的伞形物种。与大体伞形物种相比,共生物种与小体伞形物种具有相似或更高的物种丰富度。在按营养级别分类的伞形物种之间,唯一的显着差异是,杂食性伞形物种的丰富度高于食肉性鸟类伞形物种的丰富度。我们的研究结果表明保护伞物种的概念是有价值的,但是它们不支持使用我们用来识别伞物种的标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号