首页> 外文期刊>Contemporary hypnosis: the journal of the British Society of Experimental and Clinical Hypnosis >THE EFFICACY OF HYPNOTIC ANALGESIA IN ADULTS:A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE
【24h】

THE EFFICACY OF HYPNOTIC ANALGESIA IN ADULTS:A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE

机译:催眠镇痛在成人中的疗效:文献综述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article both summarizes the previous reviews of randomized, controlled trials ofhypnotic analgesia for the treatment of chronic and acute pain in adults, and reviewssimilar trials which have recently been published in the scientific literature. The resultsindicate that for both chronic and acute pain conditions: (1) hypnotic analgesia consis-tently results in greater decreases in a variety of pain outcomes compared to no treat-ment/standard care; (2) hypnosis frequently out-performs non-hypnotic interventions(e.g. education, supportive therapy) in terms of reductions in pain-related outcomes; and(3) hypnosis performs similarly to treatments that contain hypnotic elements (such asprogressive muscle relaxation), but is not surpassed in efficacy by these alternative treat-ments. Factors that may influence the efficacy of hypnotic analgesia interventions arediscussed, including, but not limited to, the patient's level of suggestibility, treatmentoutcome expectancy, and provider expertise. Based upon this body of literature, sugges-tions are offered for practitioners who are using, or would like to use, hypnosis for theamelioration of pain problems in their patients or clients.
机译:本文都总结了以前对催眠镇痛治疗成人慢性和急性疼痛的随机对照试验的评论,并综述了最近在科学文献中发表的类似试验。结果表明,对于慢性和急性疼痛情况:(1)与没有治疗/标准护理相比,催眠镇痛持续导致各种疼痛结果的减轻更大; (2)就减少与疼痛有关的结局而言,催眠的表现通常优于非催眠干预(例如教育,支持疗法); (3)催眠的作用类似于含有催眠成分的疗法(例如进行性肌肉松弛),但这些替代疗法的功效并未超过。讨论了可能影响催眠镇痛干预效果的因素,包括但不限于患者的暗示水平,治疗结果预期和提供者专业知识。根据这些文献,为正在使用或想要使用催眠术以减轻患者或客户疼痛问题的医生提供了建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号