...
首页> 外文期刊>Behavioral interventions >ASSESSING PREFERENCE IN ELDERS WITH DEMENTIA USING MULTIMEDIA AND VERBAL PLEASANT EVENTS SCHEDULES
【24h】

ASSESSING PREFERENCE IN ELDERS WITH DEMENTIA USING MULTIMEDIA AND VERBAL PLEASANT EVENTS SCHEDULES

机译:使用多媒体和言语活动表评估老年痴呆症患者的偏好

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The current study compared an abbreviated oral interview version of the Pleasant Events Schedule Alzheimer's Disease (PES-AD) to a multimedia-supplemented version. Both measures identified multiple preferred items and their scores were moderately correlated (r=.481). Direct observations were conducted to determine whether either of the two measures predicted subsequent engagement. For all nine individuals with dementia, items endorsed as preferred by both versions of the PES-AD resulted in high levels of engagement and items endorsed as non-preferred items on both measures resulted in low to moderate levels of engagement. Individuals with MMSE scores of 10 or higher had more stable and differentiated patterns of engagement than individuals with scores below 10. For individuals with higher MMSE scores, items endorsed only by the multimedia version resulted in high engagement levels (i.e., true positive) while items endorsed only on the verbal presentation resulted in low levels (i.e., false positive). Copyright (C) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
机译:当前的研究比较了“宜人活动时间表”阿尔茨海默氏病(PES-AD)的简短口头访谈版本和多媒体辅助版本。两种方法都确定了多个首选项目,并且它们的得分具有中等相关性(r = .481)。进行了直接观察以确定这两种措施中的任何一种是否都预测了随后的参与。对于所有九位患有痴呆症的人,两个版本的PES-AD认可为首选的项目导致较高的参与度,而两项措施均被认可为非优先项目的项目导致较低至中等的参与度。 MMSE分数为10或更高的个体比分数低于10的个体具有更稳定和差异化的参与模式。对于MMSE分数较高的个人,仅通过多媒体版本认可的项目会导致较高的参与度(即,真正的积极)仅在口头陈述中得到认可会导致较低水平(即误报)。版权所有(C)2008 John Wiley&Sons,Ltd.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号