首页> 外文期刊>Conservation & society >Climate Change Impacts, Conservation and Protected Values:Understanding Promotion, Ambivalence and Resistance to Policy Changeat the World Conservation Congress
【24h】

Climate Change Impacts, Conservation and Protected Values:Understanding Promotion, Ambivalence and Resistance to Policy Changeat the World Conservation Congress

机译:气候变化的影响,保护和保护价值:在世界自然保护大会上对促进,适应和抵制政策变化的理解

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The impacts of climate change imply substantive changes to current conservation policy frameworks. Debatingand formulating the details of these changes was central to the agenda of the Fourth World Conservation Congress(WCC) of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). In this paper, we document the promotion of,and resistance to, various proposals related to revising conservation policy given climate impacts as they unfoldedat this key policy-setting event. Our analysis finds that, during one-on-one interviews, many experts acknowledgedthe need for new policy means (including increased interventions) and revised policy objectives given anticipationsof habitat and species loss. However, this same pattern and the implied willingness to consider more controversialstrategies were less evident at public speaking events at the WCC. Rather, active avoidance of contentious topicswas observed in public settings. This resulted in the reinforcement (not revision) of conventional policy meansand objectives at this meeting. We suggest that this observation can at least partly be explained by the fact that thedifficult trade-offs (species for species or land base for land base) implied by nascent proposals severely violateprevailing value-based conservation commitments and so understandable resistance to change is observed.
机译:气候变化的影响意味着对当前保护政策框架的实质性变化。辩论并提出这些变化的细节是国际自然保护联盟(IUCN)第四次世界保护大会(WCC)议程的中心。在本文中,我们记录了在关键政策制定活动中由于气候影响而提出的与修改保护政策有关的各种建议的促进和抵制。我们的分析发现,在一对一的访谈中,许多专家承认有新的政策手段(包括增加干预措施)和修订的政策目标的必要性,因为人们对生境和物种的损失有所预期。但是,在WCC的公开演讲活动中,这种相同的模式以及考虑采取更多有争议的策略的隐含意愿并不明显。而是在公共场合中积极回避有争议的话题。这导致在本次会议上加强(而非修订)常规政策手段和目标。我们建议这种观察至少可以部分解释为以下事实,即新生提案所隐含的艰难权衡(物种物种或土地基础物种为土地物种)严重违反了普遍存在的基于价值的保护承诺,因此可以观察到对变化的理解阻力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号