...
【24h】

Comparison of business models for trade and finance EDI

机译:贸易和金融EDI业务模型的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This paper discusses analyzing trade and finance EDI (Electronic Data Interchange) business models, through the comparison among bolero.net and TradeCard. Marketing strategy and issues for widespread of trade and financial EDI, its effective solution and issues after proliferation of bolero.net and/or TradeCard services are discussed from the aspect of IT (Information Technology), such as comparing system and network architecture and security, and the aspect of legal framework on Electronic Commerce. Bolero.net has been trying to process trade documents electronically without changing existing business flow of document handling as far as possible, while TradeCard proposes new business flow by applying BPR (Business Process Reengineering). The system infrastructure of bolero.net and TradeCard is based on PKI (Public Key Infrastructure), which facilitates authentication of participant companies among trade and finance EDI community and secure communication on the Internet. Success factor of these business models is how to involve small to medium-sized importing/exporting companies. At present TradeCard gets an advantage, but it does not cover all trade patterns, therefore it coexists with Bolero in the near future.
机译:本文通过bolero.net和TradeCard之间的比较,讨论了分析贸易和金融EDI(电子数据交换)业务模型的过程。从IT(信息技术)的角度讨论了营销策略和广泛涉及贸易和金融EDI的问题,其有效的解决方案以及bolero.net和/或TradeCard服务激增后的问题,例如比较系统和网络架构以及安全性,以及电子商务法律框架方面。 Bolero.net一直试图以电子方式处理贸易文件,而又不改变现有文件处理的业务流程,而TradeCard则通过应用BPR(业务流程再造)来提出新的业务流程。 bolero.net和TradeCard的系统基础结构是基于PKI(公共密钥基础结构)的,该基础结构有助于在贸易和金融EDI社区中对参与公司进行身份验证,并确保Internet上的安全通信。这些商业模式的成功因素是如何使中小型进出口公司参与进来。目前,TradeCard占据了优势,但并不能涵盖所有交易模式,因此在不久的将来可以与Bolero共存。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号